State of Maharashtra Through PSO Bhamrgad vs Nagesh Aashadu Togarwar Advocate - G.S. Bogami — 282/2022

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a),(e),83. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 05th May 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHGA070005842022

Case disposed

Filing Number

512/2022

Filing Date

28-06-2022

Registration No

282/2022

Registration Date

28-06-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Divion ,Aheri

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

23

Police Station

Bhamragad

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(a),(e),83

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Through PSO Bhamrgad

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Nagesh Aashadu Togarwar Advocate - G.S. Bogami

Mangru Bandu Miccha

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

05-05-2026

Disposed

06-04-2026

Judgment

12-03-2026

Arguments

05-02-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

24-12-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Final Orders / Judgements

05-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: 282/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused Nagesh Aashadu Togarwar and Mangru Bandu Miccha under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65(E), 83). The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt despite alleging the accused were selling country liquor on August 4, 2021. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical procedural defects in the investigation. The panchnama (site inspection document) was prepared without the panch witness's involvement or knowledge, and chemical analysis reports lacked corroborating independent evidence. With only two witnesses—one uncooperative panch and the informant officer—the prosecution could not establish a conclusive case. Consequently, the court held the accused entitled to acquittal and ordered release of seized liquor to the state excise department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 282/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused Nagesh Aashadu Togarwar and Mangru Bandu Miccha under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65(E), 83). The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt despite alleging the accused were selling country liquor on August 4, 2021. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical procedural defects in the investigation. The panchnama (site inspection document) was prepared without the panch witness's involvement or knowledge, and chemical analysis reports lacked corroborating independent evidence. With only two witnesses—one uncooperative panch and the informant officer—the prosecution could not establish a conclusive case. Consequently, the court held the accused entitled to acquittal and ordered release of seized liquor to the state excise department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Divion ,Aheri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case