State of Maharashtra Through PSO Bhamrgad vs Nagesh Aashadu Togarwar Advocate - G.S. Bogami — 282/2022

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a),(e),83. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHGA070005842022

Filing Number

512/2022

Filing Date

28-Jun-2022

Registration No

282/2022

Registration Date

28-Jun-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Divion ,Aheri

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

23

Police Station

Bhamragad

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a),(e),83

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through PSO Bhamrgad

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nagesh Aashadu Togarwar Advocate - G.S. Bogami

  2. 2.Mangru Bandu Miccha

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: 282/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused Nagesh Aashadu Togarwar and Mangru Bandu Miccha under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65(E), 83). The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt despite alleging the accused were selling country liquor on August 4, 2021. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical procedural defects in the investigation. The panchnama (site inspection document) was prepared without the panch witness's involvement or knowledge, and chemical analysis reports lacked corroborating independent evidence. With only two witnesses—one uncooperative panch and the informant officer—the prosecution could not establish a conclusive case. Consequently, the court held the accused entitled to acquittal and ordered release of seized liquor to the state excise department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  7. 24-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  8. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  9. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  10. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  11. 21-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  12. 23-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  13. 11-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  14. 13-Dec-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  15. 14-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  16. 18-Sep-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  17. 30-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  18. 14-Jun-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  19. 15-May-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  20. 02-Apr-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  21. 07-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  22. 27-Dec-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  23. 17-Oct-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  24. 13-Jul-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  25. 17-May-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  26. 27-Mar-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  27. 16-Feb-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  28. 10-Jan-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  29. 22-Nov-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  30. 07-Oct-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  31. 20-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  32. 28-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 28-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 282/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 282/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused Nagesh Aashadu Togarwar and Mangru Bandu Miccha under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65(E), 83). The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt despite alleging the accused were selling country liquor on August 4, 2021. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical procedural defects in the investigation. The panchnama (site inspection document) was prepared without the panch witness's involvement or knowledge, and chemical analysis reports lacked corroborating independent evidence. With only two witnesses—one uncooperative panch and the informant officer—the prosecution could not establish a conclusive case. Consequently, the court held the accused entitled to acquittal and ordered release of seized liquor to the state excise department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case