State of Maharashtra Through PSO Aheri vs Jakesh Lalu Alam Advocate - Sau.M.U.Galbale — 60/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 28th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHGA070005192020
Filing Number
446/2020
Filing Date
28-07-2020
Registration No
60/2020
Registration Date
28-07-2020
Court
Civil Court Junior Divion ,Aheri
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
141
Police Station
Aheri
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through PSO Aheri
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Jakesh Lalu Alam Advocate - Sau.M.U.Galbale
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
Disposed
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
Charge
N.B.W._Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-03-2026 | Charge |
| 22-01-2026 | N.B.W._Ready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 60/2020 The court acquitted the accused, Jakesh Lalu Alam, of charges under Indian Penal Code Section 324 (voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapon). The prosecution alleged the accused had struck the complainant with an iron rod on 3 May 2020 over a land dispute. However, the court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The complainant-witness testified but later admitted to an out-of-court settlement with the accused. The prosecution did not examine investigating officers or independent witnesses despite having adequate opportunity. Consequently, lacking sufficient evidence, the court acquitted the accused and ordered release of the seized iron rod after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 60/2020 The court acquitted the accused, Jakesh Lalu Alam, of charges under Indian Penal Code Section 324 (voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapon). The prosecution alleged the accused had struck the complainant with an iron rod on 3 May 2020 over a land dispute. However, the court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The complainant-witness testified but later admitted to an out-of-court settlement with the accused. The prosecution did not examine investigating officers or independent witnesses despite having adequate opportunity. Consequently, lacking sufficient evidence, the court acquitted the accused and ordered release of the seized iron rod after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts