State of Maharashtra Through PSO Aheri vs Jakesh Lalu Alam Advocate - Sau.M.U.Galbale — 60/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 28th April 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHGA070005192020

Case disposed

Filing Number

446/2020

Filing Date

28-07-2020

Registration No

60/2020

Registration Date

28-07-2020

Court

Civil Court Junior Divion ,Aheri

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

Decision Date

28th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

141

Police Station

Aheri

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 324,504,506

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Through PSO Aheri

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Jakesh Lalu Alam Advocate - Sau.M.U.Galbale

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

28-04-2026

Disposed

27-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

12-03-2026

Evidence

11-03-2026

Charge

22-01-2026

N.B.W._Ready

Final Orders / Judgements

28-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: 60/2020 The court acquitted the accused, Jakesh Lalu Alam, of charges under Indian Penal Code Section 324 (voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapon). The prosecution alleged the accused had struck the complainant with an iron rod on 3 May 2020 over a land dispute. However, the court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The complainant-witness testified but later admitted to an out-of-court settlement with the accused. The prosecution did not examine investigating officers or independent witnesses despite having adequate opportunity. Consequently, lacking sufficient evidence, the court acquitted the accused and ordered release of the seized iron rod after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 60/2020 The court acquitted the accused, Jakesh Lalu Alam, of charges under Indian Penal Code Section 324 (voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapon). The prosecution alleged the accused had struck the complainant with an iron rod on 3 May 2020 over a land dispute. However, the court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The complainant-witness testified but later admitted to an out-of-court settlement with the accused. The prosecution did not examine investigating officers or independent witnesses despite having adequate opportunity. Consequently, lacking sufficient evidence, the court acquitted the accused and ordered release of the seized iron rod after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Divion ,Aheri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case