Suresh Vitthal Shende vs State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Aldandi Advocate - APP — 73/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHGA070003262026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
297/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
73/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Divion ,Aheri
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
Police Station
Etapalli
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suresh Vitthal Shende
Adv. AKDAR HANMANTU KISHTA
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Aldandi Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
Disposed
Hearing
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 06-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed Suresh Shende's application for release of his seized Hero Destini vehicle (MH-33-AK-3811), citing the Supreme Court principle that seized property should not be retained longer than absolutely necessary. The vehicle was released on a Rs. 3,00,000 Supratnama bond with conditions: the applicant cannot alter the vehicle, use it for similar offences, or transfer it; photographs must be taken; and if the accused is convicted, the vehicle or bond amount must be deposited in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court allowed Suresh Shende's application for release of his seized Hero Destini vehicle (MH-33-AK-3811), citing the Supreme Court principle that seized property should not be retained longer than absolutely necessary. The vehicle was released on a Rs. 3,00,000 Supratnama bond with conditions: the applicant cannot alter the vehicle, use it for similar offences, or transfer it; photographs must be taken; and if the accused is convicted, the vehicle or bond amount must be deposited in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts