Suresh Vitthal Shende vs State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Aldandi Advocate - APP — 73/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHGA070003262026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

297/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

73/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Divion ,Aheri

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Etapalli

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suresh Vitthal Shende

    Adv. AKDAR HANMANTU KISHTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Aldandi Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court allowed Suresh Shende's application for release of his seized Hero Destini vehicle (MH-33-AK-3811), citing the Supreme Court principle that seized property should not be retained longer than absolutely necessary. The vehicle was released on a Rs. 3,00,000 Supratnama bond with conditions: the applicant cannot alter the vehicle, use it for similar offences, or transfer it; photographs must be taken; and if the accused is convicted, the vehicle or bond amount must be deposited in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 73/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Suresh Shende's application for release of his seized Hero Destini vehicle (MH-33-AK-3811), citing the Supreme Court principle that seized property should not be retained longer than absolutely necessary. The vehicle was released on a Rs. 3,00,000 Supratnama bond with conditions: the applicant cannot alter the vehicle, use it for similar offences, or transfer it; photographs must be taken; and if the accused is convicted, the vehicle or bond amount must be deposited in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case