State of Maharashtra Through PSO Aheri vs Kishan Mutta Tekulwar Advocate - S.V.Jainwar — 26/2020
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 04th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHGA070000482020
Filing Number
43/2020
Filing Date
07-01-2020
Registration No
26/2020
Registration Date
07-01-2020
Court
Civil Court Junior Divion ,Aheri
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
252
Police Station
Aheri
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through PSO Aheri
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Kishan Mutta Tekulwar Advocate - S.V.Jainwar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 12-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Kishan Mutta Tekulwar (Case 26/2020) The court acquitted the accused, Kishan Mutta Tekulwar, of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(a), for allegedly possessing foreign liquor without authorization. Although seized materials included 12 bottles of Imperial Blue Whisky and 80 bottles of Indiana Blue Grain Whisky, the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court found that testimony came only from two police witnesses, with no corroborating independent evidence or chemical analysis reports adequately presented, making conviction unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Kishan Mutta Tekulwar (Case 26/2020) The court acquitted the accused, Kishan Mutta Tekulwar, of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(a), for allegedly possessing foreign liquor without authorization. Although seized materials included 12 bottles of Imperial Blue Whisky and 80 bottles of Indiana Blue Grain Whisky, the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court found that testimony came only from two police witnesses, with no corroborating independent evidence or chemical analysis reports adequately presented, making conviction unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts