State of Maharashtra through P.S.O., Dhanora vs Rahul Bhaktadas Madavi — 39/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHGA060000712026

Filing Number

62/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

39/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Dhanora

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Dhanora

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

29

Police Station

Dhanora

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through P.S.O., Dhanora

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rahul Bhaktadas Madavi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 39/2026 Summary: Rahul Bhaktdas Madavi, age 24, was charged with driving a Bajaj Pulsar motorcycle (MH-33/AJ-3843) under the influence of liquor on 03/03/2026 at Kanhalgaon village, Dhanora Tahsil, in violation of Section 185 of the Motor Vehicle Act. The accused pleaded guilty to the charges. The Judicial Magistrate convicted him and imposed a fine of Rs. 10,000, with one month simple imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Dhanora

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 39/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 39/2026 Summary: Rahul Bhaktdas Madavi, age 24, was charged with driving a Bajaj Pulsar motorcycle (MH-33/AJ-3843) under the influence of liquor on 03/03/2026 at Kanhalgaon village, Dhanora Tahsil, in violation of Section 185 of the Motor Vehicle Act. The accused pleaded guilty to the charges. The Judicial Magistrate convicted him and imposed a fine of Rs. 10,000, with one month simple imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case