The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Desaiganj vs Tejas Dhananjay Walde Advocate - Shri.D.W.Pilare — 966/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHGA050013052025
Filing Number
1219/2025
Filing Date
04-Dec-2025
Registration No
966/2025
Registration Date
04-Dec-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Desaiganj
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.
Decision Date
13-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
535
Police Station
Desaiganj
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Desaiganj
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Tejas Dhananjay Walde Advocate - Shri.D.W.Pilare
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Apr-2026
Copy of Judgment
Case Summary: 966/2025 The First Class Magistrate Court at Desaiganj acquitted accused Tejas Dhananjay Walde of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The prosecution failed to establish that the accused illegally possessed 10 bottles (90ml each) of country liquor for sale on 16 October 2025. The court found critical evidentiary gaps: prosecution witnesses lacked knowledge of the seizure panchnama contents, the chemical analysis report's chain of custody was unclear, and no witness testified regarding the sample's transmission to the laboratory. Consequently, the accused was acquitted and his bail bond cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.
-
06-Apr-2026
Judgment
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.
-
18-Mar-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.
-
04-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 966/2025
Case Summary: 966/2025 The First Class Magistrate Court at Desaiganj acquitted accused Tejas Dhananjay Walde of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The prosecution failed to establish that the accused illegally possessed 10 bottles (90ml each) of country liquor for sale on 16 October 2025. The court found critical evidentiary gaps: prosecution witnesses lacked knowledge of the seizure panchnama contents, the chemical analysis report's chain of custody was unclear, and no witness testified regarding the sample's transmission to the laboratory. Consequently, the accused was acquitted and his bail bond cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts