The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Desaiganj vs Nanda Haridas Shingade Advocate - Shri.M.R.Shende — 870/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHGA050011692025
Filing Number
1092/2025
Filing Date
10-Oct-2025
Registration No
870/2025
Registration Date
10-Oct-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Desaiganj
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
445
Police Station
Desaiganj
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Desaiganj
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nanda Haridas Shingade Advocate - Shri.M.R.Shende
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-May-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.
-
10-Oct-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 870/2025 Summary: The court granted the Desaiganj Police Station's petition to dispose of 20 bottles of seized liquor (90ml each, excluding chemical test samples) by sending them to the State Excise Officer, Gadchiroli for proper disposal. The court found that storing large quantities of liquor at the police station causes nuisance to citizens and staff, creates space constraints, and serves no legal purpose, citing Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 870/2025
Case 870/2025 Summary: The court granted the Desaiganj Police Station's petition to dispose of 20 bottles of seized liquor (90ml each, excluding chemical test samples) by sending them to the State Excise Officer, Gadchiroli for proper disposal. The court found that storing large quantities of liquor at the police station causes nuisance to citizens and staff, creates space constraints, and serves no legal purpose, citing Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts