The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Desaiganj vs Dinesh Maroti Wazade Advocate - Shri.M.R.Shende — 667/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 07th August 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 07-Aug-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHGA050008602025

Filing Number

808/2025

Filing Date

11-Jul-2025

Registration No

667/2025

Registration Date

11-Jul-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Desaiganj

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

276

Police Station

Desaiganj

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Desaiganj

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dinesh Maroti Wazade Advocate - Shri.M.R.Shende

Case History

  1. 07-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-May-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  4. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  5. 01-Oct-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  6. 01-Oct-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 667/2025 Summary: The court allowed the police station's petition for disposal of 21 bottles of seized liquor (90 ml each, excluding chemical analysis samples) from case FIR 276/2025. The court ordered the Excise Superintendent, Gadchiroli, to arrange proper destruction of the seized liquor, citing space constraints at the police station and the Supreme Court's principle that large quantities of liquor should not be stored at police stations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 01-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  8. 11-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 11-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 667/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 667/2025 Summary: The court allowed the police station's petition for disposal of 21 bottles of seized liquor (90 ml each, excluding chemical analysis samples) from case FIR 276/2025. The court ordered the Excise Superintendent, Gadchiroli, to arrange proper destruction of the seized liquor, citing space constraints at the police station and the Supreme Court's principle that large quantities of liquor should not be stored at police stations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case