The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Desaiganj vs Vandana Vilas Gotefhode Advocate - S.S.Guru — 601/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHGA050007842025
Filing Number
735/2025
Filing Date
02-07-2025
Registration No
601/2025
Registration Date
02-07-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Desaiganj
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
299
Police Station
Desaiganj
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Desaiganj
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Vandana Vilas Gotefhode Advocate - S.S.Guru
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 20-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 31-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vandana Vilas Gotefhode (Case 601/2025) The court acquitted the accused Vandana Vilas Gotefhode of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged she illegally possessed 12 bottles of country-made liquor (90ml each) for sale on 08/06/2025, but failed to establish this beyond reasonable doubt due to critical evidentiary gaps. The judgment found that prosecution witnesses were unreliable, the chain of custody for seized samples was not properly established, and the chemical analysis report lacked corroboration regarding which samples were tested. Without credible evidence linking the accused to illegal liquor possession for sale, the court found the prosecution's case unproven and granted her acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vandana Vilas Gotefhode (Case 601/2025) The court acquitted the accused Vandana Vilas Gotefhode of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged she illegally possessed 12 bottles of country-made liquor (90ml each) for sale on 08/06/2025, but failed to establish this beyond reasonable doubt due to critical evidentiary gaps. The judgment found that prosecution witnesses were unreliable, the chain of custody for seized samples was not properly established, and the chemical analysis report lacked corroboration regarding which samples were tested. Without credible evidence linking the accused to illegal liquor possession for sale, the court found the prosecution's case unproven and granted her acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts