The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Desaiganj vs Gopika Rajendra Suryavanshi Advocate - Shri.M.R.Shende — 330/2022
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65,(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHGA050005052022
Filing Number
462/2022
Filing Date
21-07-2022
Registration No
330/2022
Registration Date
21-07-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Desaiganj
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
0652
Police Station
Desaiganj
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Desaiganj
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Gopika Rajendra Suryavanshi Advocate - Shri.M.R.Shende
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 21-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 03-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 15-01-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 330/2022 The State of Maharashtra v. Gopika Rajendra Suryavanshi Decision: The accused, Gopika Rajendra Suryavanshi, was acquitted of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish that the accused unlawfully possessed ten bottles (90ml each) of country liquor for sale. Critical evidentiary gaps included: the sole witness was unreliable and showed contradictions; the complainant's statement was not recorded; the chain of custody for chemical analysis samples was not clearly established; and no witness testified regarding the transfer of seized samples to the chemical laboratory. Without proper chain of custody and independent corroboration, the prosecution could not prove the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 330/2022 The State of Maharashtra v. Gopika Rajendra Suryavanshi Decision: The accused, Gopika Rajendra Suryavanshi, was acquitted of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish that the accused unlawfully possessed ten bottles (90ml each) of country liquor for sale. Critical evidentiary gaps included: the sole witness was unreliable and showed contradictions; the complainant's statement was not recorded; the chain of custody for chemical analysis samples was not clearly established; and no witness testified regarding the transfer of seized samples to the chemical laboratory. Without proper chain of custody and independent corroboration, the prosecution could not prove the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts