The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Desaiganj vs Gopika Rajendra Suryavanshi Advocate - Shri.M.R.Shende — 330/2022

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65,(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHGA050005052022

Case disposed

Filing Number

462/2022

Filing Date

21-07-2022

Registration No

330/2022

Registration Date

21-07-2022

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Desaiganj

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

0652

Police Station

Desaiganj

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65,(e)

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Desaiganj

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Gopika Rajendra Suryavanshi Advocate - Shri.M.R.Shende

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

12-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Judgment

21-02-2026

Arguments

03-02-2026

Arguments

15-01-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: 330/2022 The State of Maharashtra v. Gopika Rajendra Suryavanshi Decision: The accused, Gopika Rajendra Suryavanshi, was acquitted of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish that the accused unlawfully possessed ten bottles (90ml each) of country liquor for sale. Critical evidentiary gaps included: the sole witness was unreliable and showed contradictions; the complainant's statement was not recorded; the chain of custody for chemical analysis samples was not clearly established; and no witness testified regarding the transfer of seized samples to the chemical laboratory. Without proper chain of custody and independent corroboration, the prosecution could not prove the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 330/2022 The State of Maharashtra v. Gopika Rajendra Suryavanshi Decision: The accused, Gopika Rajendra Suryavanshi, was acquitted of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish that the accused unlawfully possessed ten bottles (90ml each) of country liquor for sale. Critical evidentiary gaps included: the sole witness was unreliable and showed contradictions; the complainant's statement was not recorded; the chain of custody for chemical analysis samples was not clearly established; and no witness testified regarding the transfer of seized samples to the chemical laboratory. Without proper chain of custody and independent corroboration, the prosecution could not prove the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Desaiganj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case