The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Desaiganj vs Dipak Pandurang Donadkar Advocate - Shri.M.R.Shende — 24/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED AND RELEASED ON PROBATION on 17th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHGA050003712020
Filing Number
342/2020
Filing Date
31-07-2020
Registration No
24/2020
Registration Date
31-07-2020
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Desaiganj
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED AND RELEASED ON PROBATION
FIR Details
FIR Number
50
Police Station
Desaiganj
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Desaiganj
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Dipak Pandurang Donadkar Advocate - Shri.M.R.Shende
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Dipak Pandurang Donadkar (RCC 24/2020) The court convicted Dipak Pandurang Donadkar under Section 324 IPC for voluntarily causing hurt using a stick as a weapon. The victim suffered a 12cm laceration on his forehead after being struck from behind during a quarrel. Medical evidence and eyewitness testimony corroborated the incident. Instead of imprisonment, the court released the accused on one-year probation with Rs.15,000 bond, citing lack of criminal history and the parties' police-station settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Dipak Pandurang Donadkar (RCC 24/2020) The court convicted Dipak Pandurang Donadkar under Section 324 IPC for voluntarily causing hurt using a stick as a weapon. The victim suffered a 12cm laceration on his forehead after being struck from behind during a quarrel. Medical evidence and eyewitness testimony corroborated the incident. Instead of imprisonment, the court released the accused on one-year probation with Rs.15,000 bond, citing lack of criminal history and the parties' police-station settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts