The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Desaiganj vs Salman Sabbirkhan Pathan Advocate - Shri.D.W.Pilare — 25/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 17th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHGA050002802017
Filing Number
239/2017
Filing Date
26-07-2017
Registration No
25/2017
Registration Date
26-07-2017
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Desaiganj
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
63
Police Station
Gadchiroli
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Desaiganj
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Salman Sabbirkhan Pathan Advocate - Shri.D.W.Pilare
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Regular Criminal Case No. 25/2017 Court Decision: The accused, Salman Sabbirkhan Pathan, was acquitted of charges under IPC sections 457 and 380 (theft/burglary) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the seized rice and pulses belonged to the complainant's store or that the accused committed the theft. Key Reasoning: Although the complainant reported a theft from his grain shop, the prosecution could not establish a clear connection between the recovered goods and the complainant's store, nor provide eyewitness testimony of the accused committing the crime. Discrepancies existed regarding when the accused was arrested versus when the seized materials were produced, and the panchnama (scene documentation) lacked corroborating details to link the accused to the specific stolen items. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Regular Criminal Case No. 25/2017 Court Decision: The accused, Salman Sabbirkhan Pathan, was acquitted of charges under IPC sections 457 and 380 (theft/burglary) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the seized rice and pulses belonged to the complainant's store or that the accused committed the theft. Key Reasoning: Although the complainant reported a theft from his grain shop, the prosecution could not establish a clear connection between the recovered goods and the complainant's store, nor provide eyewitness testimony of the accused committing the crime. Discrepancies existed regarding when the accused was arrested versus when the seized materials were produced, and the panchnama (scene documentation) lacked corroborating details to link the accused to the specific stolen items. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts