The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Desaiganj vs Shri. Rehaj Rahimkhan Pathan Advocate - Ayesha I. Shekhani — 69/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHGA050001172026

Filing Number

98/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

69/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Desaiganj

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

61

Police Station

Desaiganj

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Desaiganj

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shri. Rehaj Rahimkhan Pathan Advocate - Ayesha I. Shekhani

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    PleaView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Rehaj Rahimakha Pathan (69/2026) The accused pleaded guilty to driving a two-wheeler without registration at high speed while intoxicated on 05/02/2026, violating Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The court convicted him under Section 275 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita and imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 1,000 fine (or 3 days imprisonment in default) considering his poverty, first-time offense, and age. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 69/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Rehaj Rahimakha Pathan (69/2026) The accused pleaded guilty to driving a two-wheeler without registration at high speed while intoxicated on 05/02/2026, violating Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The court convicted him under Section 275 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita and imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 1,000 fine (or 3 days imprisonment in default) considering his poverty, first-time offense, and age. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case