The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Desaiganj vs Prashant Tolaram Meshram Advocate - S.S.Guru — 77/2022

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65,(E). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHGA050001062022

Filing Number

99/2022

Filing Date

14-Feb-2022

Registration No

77/2022

Registration Date

14-Feb-2022

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Desaiganj

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0275

Police Station

Desaiganj

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65,(E)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Desaiganj

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prashant Tolaram Meshram Advocate - S.S.Guru

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment

    Case Summary: 77/2022 Court Decision: The accused, Prashant Tolaram Meshram, was acquitted of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The prosecution failed to establish the offense beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court found critical gaps in the prosecution's evidence chain, including the absence of the complainant's testimony, lack of witness credibility (the sole witness contradicted the prosecution's account), and absence of proper chain of custody documentation for the chemical examination sample, making it impossible to prove the accused possessed illicit liquor for sale. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  5. 02-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  6. 15-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  7. 01-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  8. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  9. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  10. 09-May-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  11. 13-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  12. 14-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  13. 29-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  14. 17-May-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  15. 07-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  16. 19-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  17. 21-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  18. 27-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  19. 20-May-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  20. 24-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  21. 26-Dec-2022

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  22. 28-Sep-2022

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  23. 30-Jun-2022

    Plea / Particulars

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  24. 20-Apr-2022

    Plea / Particulars

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

  25. 14-Feb-2022

    Order on Exhibit

  26. 14-Feb-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 14-Feb-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 77/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 77/2022 Court Decision: The accused, Prashant Tolaram Meshram, was acquitted of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The prosecution failed to establish the offense beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court found critical gaps in the prosecution's evidence chain, including the absence of the complainant's testimony, lack of witness credibility (the sole witness contradicted the prosecution's account), and absence of proper chain of custody documentation for the chemical examination sample, making it impossible to prove the accused possessed illicit liquor for sale. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case