The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Desaiganj vs Suman Kusan Balapure Advocate - Ayesha I. Shekhani — 57/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 30th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHGA050000992025

Case disposed

Filing Number

87/2025

Filing Date

11-02-2025

Registration No

57/2025

Registration Date

11-02-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Desaiganj

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

504

Police Station

Desaiganj

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Desaiganj

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Suman Kusan Balapure Advocate - Ayesha I. Shekhani

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.

30-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Judgment

23-01-2026

Arguments

12-01-2026

Arguments

16-12-2025

N.B.W._Ready

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary of Case 57/2025 The court acquitted the accused, Suman Kusan Balapure, of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was illegally possessing 20 liters of country-made liquor for sale, primarily due to critical evidentiary gaps: the investigating officer was not examined, the seizure panchnama chain of custody was not established, and the chemical analysis report could not be definitively linked to the seized samples. Consequently, the court found the prosecution's case insufficient and discharged the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 57/2025 The court acquitted the accused, Suman Kusan Balapure, of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was illegally possessing 20 liters of country-made liquor for sale, primarily due to critical evidentiary gaps: the investigating officer was not examined, the seizure panchnama chain of custody was not established, and the chemical analysis report could not be definitively linked to the seized samples. Consequently, the court found the prosecution's case insufficient and discharged the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Desaiganj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case