The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Desaiganj vs Suman Kusan Balapure Advocate - Ayesha I. Shekhani — 57/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 30th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHGA050000992025
Filing Number
87/2025
Filing Date
11-02-2025
Registration No
57/2025
Registration Date
11-02-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Desaiganj
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
504
Police Station
Desaiganj
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Desaiganj
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Suman Kusan Balapure Advocate - Ayesha I. Shekhani
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
N.B.W._Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 23-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-12-2025 | N.B.W._Ready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 57/2025 The court acquitted the accused, Suman Kusan Balapure, of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was illegally possessing 20 liters of country-made liquor for sale, primarily due to critical evidentiary gaps: the investigating officer was not examined, the seizure panchnama chain of custody was not established, and the chemical analysis report could not be definitively linked to the seized samples. Consequently, the court found the prosecution's case insufficient and discharged the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 57/2025 The court acquitted the accused, Suman Kusan Balapure, of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was illegally possessing 20 liters of country-made liquor for sale, primarily due to critical evidentiary gaps: the investigating officer was not examined, the seizure panchnama chain of custody was not established, and the chemical analysis report could not be definitively linked to the seized samples. Consequently, the court found the prosecution's case insufficient and discharged the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts