The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Desaiganj vs Sanjay Shalikram Thakare and 01 Advocate - S.S.Guru — 53/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 31st March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHGA050000922025
Filing Number
80/2025
Filing Date
10-02-2025
Registration No
53/2025
Registration Date
10-02-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Desaiganj
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
462
Police Station
Desaiganj
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Desaiganj
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sanjay Shalikram Thakare and 01 Advocate - S.S.Guru
Roshan Motiram Bhaisare
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Desaiganj.
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 26-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 53/2025 Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate at Desaiganj acquitted both accused, Sanjay Shalikram Thakare and Roshan Motiram Bhaisare, of charges under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Gambling Prohibition Act. The prosecution failed to establish its case, as the two panch witnesses (Firoz Khobragarade and Avinash Ghutke) could not identify the accused or corroborate the prosecution's allegations regarding alleged gambling activities on 26/10/2023. Without credible witness testimony or documentary evidence linking the accused to the offense, the court found reasonable doubt and declared them not guilty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 53/2025 Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate at Desaiganj acquitted both accused, Sanjay Shalikram Thakare and Roshan Motiram Bhaisare, of charges under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Gambling Prohibition Act. The prosecution failed to establish its case, as the two panch witnesses (Firoz Khobragarade and Avinash Ghutke) could not identify the accused or corroborate the prosecution's allegations regarding alleged gambling activities on 26/10/2023. Without credible witness testimony or documentary evidence linking the accused to the offense, the court found reasonable doubt and declared them not guilty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts