Dinesh Ghanshyam Kannake and others vs Nill — 46/2025

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 8. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 06th May 2026.

M.J.Cases - Misc. Judicial Cases

CNR: MHGA040008152025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

19-12-2025

Filing Number

87/2025

Filing Date

22-12-2025

Registration No

46/2025

Registration Date

22-12-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Divion , Armori

Judge

1-Civil Judge [Jr.Dn] J.M.F.C. Armori

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 8

Petitioner(s)

Dinesh Ghanshyam Kannake and others

Adv. TAGADE AMIT ANGADHWAJ

Unnikrushna Ghanshyam Kannake

Adv. TAGADE AMIT ANGADHWAJ

Karuna Milan Puram

Adv. TAGADE AMIT ANGADHWAJ

Chhayatai Ghanshyam Kannake

Adv. TAGADE AMIT ANGADHWAJ

Shantabai Bhagwan Kannake

Adv. TAGADE AMIT ANGADHWAJ

Respondent(s)

Nill

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge [Jr.Dn] J.M.F.C. Armori

06-05-2026

Disposed

29-04-2026

Evidence

17-04-2026

Evidence

09-04-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

06-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: M.J.C. No. 46/2025 The Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.), Armori granted the application of five applicants (children and wife of deceased Ghanshyam Bhagwan Kannake, who died on 28.12.2022) for issuance of a legal heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827. The court found that applicants were the sole legal heirs, with no objections raised despite proper newspaper publication and notice board intimation, and issued the certificate on payment of requisite court fees with conditions requiring submission of property inventory within six months and accounts within one year. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: M.J.C. No. 46/2025 The Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.), Armori granted the application of five applicants (children and wife of deceased Ghanshyam Bhagwan Kannake, who died on 28.12.2022) for issuance of a legal heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827. The court found that applicants were the sole legal heirs, with no objections raised despite proper newspaper publication and notice board intimation, and issued the certificate on payment of requisite court fees with conditions requiring submission of property inventory within six months and accounts within one year. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Divion , Armori All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case