Dinesh Ghanshyam Kannake and others vs Nill — 46/2025
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 8. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 06th May 2026.
M.J.Cases - Misc. Judicial Cases
CNR: MHGA040008152025
e-Filing Number
19-12-2025
Filing Number
87/2025
Filing Date
22-12-2025
Registration No
46/2025
Registration Date
22-12-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Divion , Armori
Judge
1-Civil Judge [Jr.Dn] J.M.F.C. Armori
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dinesh Ghanshyam Kannake and others
Adv. TAGADE AMIT ANGADHWAJ
Unnikrushna Ghanshyam Kannake
Adv. TAGADE AMIT ANGADHWAJ
Karuna Milan Puram
Adv. TAGADE AMIT ANGADHWAJ
Chhayatai Ghanshyam Kannake
Adv. TAGADE AMIT ANGADHWAJ
Shantabai Bhagwan Kannake
Adv. TAGADE AMIT ANGADHWAJ
Respondent(s)
Nill
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge [Jr.Dn] J.M.F.C. Armori
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: M.J.C. No. 46/2025 The Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.), Armori granted the application of five applicants (children and wife of deceased Ghanshyam Bhagwan Kannake, who died on 28.12.2022) for issuance of a legal heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827. The court found that applicants were the sole legal heirs, with no objections raised despite proper newspaper publication and notice board intimation, and issued the certificate on payment of requisite court fees with conditions requiring submission of property inventory within six months and accounts within one year. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: M.J.C. No. 46/2025 The Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.), Armori granted the application of five applicants (children and wife of deceased Ghanshyam Bhagwan Kannake, who died on 28.12.2022) for issuance of a legal heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827. The court found that applicants were the sole legal heirs, with no objections raised despite proper newspaper publication and notice board intimation, and issued the certificate on payment of requisite court fees with conditions requiring submission of property inventory within six months and accounts within one year. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts