State of Maharashtra through Police Station Officer, Police Station, Armori vs Manik Shrawan Mankar and other Advocate - P.R.Dhonge — 90/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 04th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHGA040007792025
Filing Number
697/2025
Filing Date
15-Dec-2025
Registration No
90/2025
Registration Date
15-Dec-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Divion , Armori
Judge
1-Civil Judge [Jr.Dn] J.M.F.C. Armori
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
338
Police Station
Armori
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra through Police Station Officer, Police Station, Armori
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Manik Shrawan Mankar and other Advocate - P.R.Dhonge
-
2.Ritik Moreshwar Sayam
-
3.Rajeshwar Hanuji Dumane
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: 90/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted all three accused (Manik Shrawan Mankar, Ritik Moreshwar Sayam, and Rajeshwar Hanuji Dumane) of charges under IPC Sections 118(1) and 3(5), finding the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The complainant, an injured witness, contradicted his initial FIR statement during cross-examination, admitting he had settled the matter with the accused outside court, which fatally weakened the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge [Jr.Dn] J.M.F.C. Armori
-
29-Apr-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge [Jr.Dn] J.M.F.C. Armori
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge [Jr.Dn] J.M.F.C. Armori
-
02-Feb-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge [Jr.Dn] J.M.F.C. Armori
-
15-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 90/2025
Case Summary: 90/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted all three accused (Manik Shrawan Mankar, Ritik Moreshwar Sayam, and Rajeshwar Hanuji Dumane) of charges under IPC Sections 118(1) and 3(5), finding the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The complainant, an injured witness, contradicted his initial FIR statement during cross-examination, admitting he had settled the matter with the accused outside court, which fatally weakened the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts