State of Maharashtra through Police Station Officer, Police Station Armori vs Bholanath Daulat Meshram Advocate - Nargisbano Akbarkha Pathan — 385/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 05th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHGA040005912025
Filing Number
531/2025
Filing Date
17-09-2025
Registration No
385/2025
Registration Date
17-09-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Divion , Armori
Judge
1-Civil Judge [Jr.Dn] J.M.F.C. Armori
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
24
Police Station
Armori
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through Police Station Officer, Police Station Armori
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Bholanath Daulat Meshram Advocate - Nargisbano Akbarkha Pathan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge [Jr.Dn] J.M.F.C. Armori
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 28-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 385/2025 Court Decision: The accused Bholanath Daulat Meshram was acquitted of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole prosecution witness (panchnama witness) provided no corroborative evidence and did not assist the investigation. Additionally, the chemical analysis report regarding the seized liquid could not be conclusively linked to the accused due to lack of proper chain of custody. Key Reasoning: The court held that mere possession of a container with allegedly illicit liquor was insufficient without establishing a direct connection between the accused and the seized substance. The absence of supporting witnesses and the prosecution's failure to properly prove the recovered liquid was alcohol rendered the charges unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 385/2025 Court Decision: The accused Bholanath Daulat Meshram was acquitted of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole prosecution witness (panchnama witness) provided no corroborative evidence and did not assist the investigation. Additionally, the chemical analysis report regarding the seized liquid could not be conclusively linked to the accused due to lack of proper chain of custody. Key Reasoning: The court held that mere possession of a container with allegedly illicit liquor was insufficient without establishing a direct connection between the accused and the seized substance. The absence of supporting witnesses and the prosecution's failure to properly prove the recovered liquid was alcohol rendered the charges unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts