State of Maharashtra through Police Station Officer, Police Station Armori vs Bholanath Daulat Meshram Advocate - Nargisbano Akbarkha Pathan — 385/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 05th May 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHGA040005912025

Case disposed

Filing Number

531/2025

Filing Date

17-09-2025

Registration No

385/2025

Registration Date

17-09-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Divion , Armori

Judge

1-Civil Judge [Jr.Dn] J.M.F.C. Armori

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

24

Police Station

Armori

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra through Police Station Officer, Police Station Armori

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Bholanath Daulat Meshram Advocate - Nargisbano Akbarkha Pathan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge [Jr.Dn] J.M.F.C. Armori

05-05-2026

Disposed

04-05-2026

Evidence

28-04-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

06-02-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

05-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary of Case 385/2025 Court Decision: The accused Bholanath Daulat Meshram was acquitted of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole prosecution witness (panchnama witness) provided no corroborative evidence and did not assist the investigation. Additionally, the chemical analysis report regarding the seized liquid could not be conclusively linked to the accused due to lack of proper chain of custody. Key Reasoning: The court held that mere possession of a container with allegedly illicit liquor was insufficient without establishing a direct connection between the accused and the seized substance. The absence of supporting witnesses and the prosecution's failure to properly prove the recovered liquid was alcohol rendered the charges unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 385/2025 Court Decision: The accused Bholanath Daulat Meshram was acquitted of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole prosecution witness (panchnama witness) provided no corroborative evidence and did not assist the investigation. Additionally, the chemical analysis report regarding the seized liquid could not be conclusively linked to the accused due to lack of proper chain of custody. Key Reasoning: The court held that mere possession of a container with allegedly illicit liquor was insufficient without establishing a direct connection between the accused and the seized substance. The absence of supporting witnesses and the prosecution's failure to properly prove the recovered liquid was alcohol rendered the charges unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Divion , Armori All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case