State of Maharashtra through Police Station Officer, Police Station, Armori vs Tarkeshwar Pundalik Sakharkar Advocate - Nargisbano Akbarkha Pathan — 222/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 281,125(a),125(b). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHGA040003822025

Filing Number

337/2025

Filing Date

17-Jul-2025

Registration No

222/2025

Registration Date

17-Jul-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Divion , Armori

Judge

1-Civil Judge [Jr.Dn] J.M.F.C. Armori

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

351

Police Station

Armori

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 281,125(a),125(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through Police Station Officer, Police Station, Armori

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Tarkeshwar Pundalik Sakharkar Advocate - Nargisbano Akbarkha Pathan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Tarkeshwar Pundalik Sakharkar Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate at Armori acquitted the accused, Tarkeshwar Pundalik Sakharkar, of charges under IPC Sections 281, 125(a), and 125(b) on May 4, 2026. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused recklessly drove his vehicle (MAH-49 AT 8561) in a manner endangering human life or caused grievous/simple injuries to the complainant and his family. Key Reasoning: The sole prosecution witness (complainant Atul Pandhrinadh Lakshmane) admitted during cross-examination that he had settled the matter with the accused outside court and did not wish to pursue the case further. The accused's personal and surety bonds were cancelled, and he was ordered to pay Rs. 15,000 compensation under Section 481(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge [Jr.Dn] J.M.F.C. Armori

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge [Jr.Dn] J.M.F.C. Armori

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge [Jr.Dn] J.M.F.C. Armori

  6. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge [Jr.Dn] J.M.F.C. Armori

  7. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge [Jr.Dn] J.M.F.C. Armori

  8. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge [Jr.Dn] J.M.F.C. Armori

  9. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge [Jr.Dn] J.M.F.C. Armori

  10. 25-Aug-2025

    Plea / Particulars

    Civil Judge [Jr.Dn] J.M.F.C. Armori

  11. 17-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 17-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 222/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Tarkeshwar Pundalik Sakharkar Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate at Armori acquitted the accused, Tarkeshwar Pundalik Sakharkar, of charges under IPC Sections 281, 125(a), and 125(b) on May 4, 2026. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused recklessly drove his vehicle (MAH-49 AT 8561) in a manner endangering human life or caused grievous/simple injuries to the complainant and his family. Key Reasoning: The sole prosecution witness (complainant Atul Pandhrinadh Lakshmane) admitted during cross-examination that he had settled the matter with the accused outside court and did not wish to pursue the case further. The accused's personal and surety bonds were cancelled, and he was ordered to pay Rs. 15,000 compensation under Section 481(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case