State of Maharashtra through Police Station Officer, Police Station, Armori vs Tarkeshwar Pundalik Sakharkar Advocate - Nargisbano Akbarkha Pathan — 222/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 281,125(a),125(b). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 04th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHGA040003822025
Filing Number
337/2025
Filing Date
17-07-2025
Registration No
222/2025
Registration Date
17-07-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Divion , Armori
Judge
1-Civil Judge [Jr.Dn] J.M.F.C. Armori
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
351
Police Station
Armori
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through Police Station Officer, Police Station, Armori
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Tarkeshwar Pundalik Sakharkar Advocate - Nargisbano Akbarkha Pathan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge [Jr.Dn] J.M.F.C. Armori
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 21-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-12-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Tarkeshwar Pundalik Sakharkar Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate at Armori acquitted the accused, Tarkeshwar Pundalik Sakharkar, of charges under IPC Sections 281, 125(a), and 125(b) on May 4, 2026. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused recklessly drove his vehicle (MAH-49 AT 8561) in a manner endangering human life or caused grievous/simple injuries to the complainant and his family. Key Reasoning: The sole prosecution witness (complainant Atul Pandhrinadh Lakshmane) admitted during cross-examination that he had settled the matter with the accused outside court and did not wish to pursue the case further. The accused's personal and surety bonds were cancelled, and he was ordered to pay Rs. 15,000 compensation under Section 481(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Tarkeshwar Pundalik Sakharkar Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate at Armori acquitted the accused, Tarkeshwar Pundalik Sakharkar, of charges under IPC Sections 281, 125(a), and 125(b) on May 4, 2026. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused recklessly drove his vehicle (MAH-49 AT 8561) in a manner endangering human life or caused grievous/simple injuries to the complainant and his family. Key Reasoning: The sole prosecution witness (complainant Atul Pandhrinadh Lakshmane) admitted during cross-examination that he had settled the matter with the accused outside court and did not wish to pursue the case further. The accused's personal and surety bonds were cancelled, and he was ordered to pay Rs. 15,000 compensation under Section 481(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts