Namobai Bhagrath Tulavi vs Bhagrath Rajeshwar Tulavi — 39/2023
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
PWDVA Appln.
CNR: MHGA030014252023
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
e-Filing Number
06-11-2023
Filing Number
1423/2023
Filing Date
07-11-2023
Registration No
39/2023
Registration Date
07-11-2023
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gadchiroli
Judge
9-Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Namobai Bhagrath Tulavi
Adv. V.S.Padmgirwar
Sahil Bhagrath Tulavi
Nikhil Bhagrath Tulavi
Adv. PADMAGIRIWAR VIJAY SHAMRAO
Jintu Bhagrath Tulavi
Respondent(s)
Bhagrath Rajeshwar Tulavi
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 31-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: P.W.D.V.A. Application No. 39/2023 The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gadchiroli, partly allowed a domestic violence petition filed by a woman and three children against her husband under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence and economic abuse, and ordered the husband to pay interim maintenance of Rs. 3,000/month to the wife and Rs. 1,000/month each to the three children pending trial. The court also issued a temporary protection order prohibiting the husband from committing any act of domestic violence. Claims for property alienation restraint and residential rent were rejected due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: P.W.D.V.A. Application No. 39/2023 The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gadchiroli, partly allowed a domestic violence petition filed by a woman and three children against her husband under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence and economic abuse, and ordered the husband to pay interim maintenance of Rs. 3,000/month to the wife and Rs. 1,000/month each to the three children pending trial. The court also issued a temporary protection order prohibiting the husband from committing any act of domestic violence. Claims for property alienation restraint and residential rent were rejected due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts