Namobai Bhagrath Tulavi vs Bhagrath Rajeshwar Tulavi — 39/2023

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

PWDVA Appln.

CNR: MHGA030014252023

Evidence

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

e-Filing Number

06-11-2023

Filing Number

1423/2023

Filing Date

07-11-2023

Registration No

39/2023

Registration Date

07-11-2023

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gadchiroli

Judge

9-Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12

Petitioner(s)

Namobai Bhagrath Tulavi

Adv. V.S.Padmgirwar

Sahil Bhagrath Tulavi

Nikhil Bhagrath Tulavi

Adv. PADMAGIRIWAR VIJAY SHAMRAO

Jintu Bhagrath Tulavi

Respondent(s)

Bhagrath Rajeshwar Tulavi

Hearing History

Judge: 9-Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.

21-05-2026

Evidence

13-04-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

03-02-2026

Evidence

31-12-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

05-07-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: P.W.D.V.A. Application No. 39/2023 The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gadchiroli, partly allowed a domestic violence petition filed by a woman and three children against her husband under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence and economic abuse, and ordered the husband to pay interim maintenance of Rs. 3,000/month to the wife and Rs. 1,000/month each to the three children pending trial. The court also issued a temporary protection order prohibiting the husband from committing any act of domestic violence. Claims for property alienation restraint and residential rent were rejected due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: P.W.D.V.A. Application No. 39/2023 The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gadchiroli, partly allowed a domestic violence petition filed by a woman and three children against her husband under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence and economic abuse, and ordered the husband to pay interim maintenance of Rs. 3,000/month to the wife and Rs. 1,000/month each to the three children pending trial. The court also issued a temporary protection order prohibiting the husband from committing any act of domestic violence. Claims for property alienation restraint and residential rent were rejected due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gadchiroli All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case