State of Maharashtra through PSO, Gadchiroli vs Naushad Abbas Kureshi Advocate - K.S.Akhade — 160/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 429. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case

CNR: MHGA030013732023

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

e-Filing Number

26-10-2023

Filing Number

1371/2023

Filing Date

27-10-2023

Registration No

160/2023

Registration Date

27-10-2023

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gadchiroli

Judge

7-Chief Judicial Magistrate Gadchiroli.

FIR Details

FIR Number

56

Police Station

Gadchiroli

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 429
Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act Section 1995 5C 9A

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra through PSO, Gadchiroli

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Naushad Abbas Kureshi Advocate - K.S.Akhade

Hearing History

Judge: 7-Chief Judicial Magistrate Gadchiroli.

19-05-2026

Evidence Part Heard

28-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

12-03-2026

Order on Exh

05-02-2026

Order on Exh

23-01-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

28-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case 160/2023 Summary: The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gadchiroli allowed the accused Naushad Abbas Kureshi's application to recall witness PW-5 (Gajanan Sahare, the informant) for further cross-examination. The court found that material questions remained unanswered and the prosecution was still examining witnesses, making recall non-prejudicial. The application was granted subject to compensatory costs of Rs. 300/- payable to the witness, with summons to be issued for further cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 160/2023 Summary: The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gadchiroli allowed the accused Naushad Abbas Kureshi's application to recall witness PW-5 (Gajanan Sahare, the informant) for further cross-examination. The court found that material questions remained unanswered and the prosecution was still examining witnesses, making recall non-prejudicial. The application was granted subject to compensatory costs of Rs. 300/- payable to the witness, with summons to be issued for further cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gadchiroli All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case