STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PSO GADCHIROLI vs VAISHALI DHANRAJ PIPARE Advocate - N.S.Undirwade — 492/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd April 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHGA030008072025
e-Filing Number
03-07-2025
Filing Number
806/2025
Filing Date
05-Jul-2025
Registration No
492/2025
Registration Date
05-Jul-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gadchiroli
Judge
9-Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
909
Police Station
Gadchiroli
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PSO GADCHIROLI
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.VAISHALI DHANRAJ PIPARE Advocate - N.S.Undirwade
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
Copy of Judgment
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vaishali Dhanraj Pipare The court acquitted the accused, Vaishali Dhanraj Pipare, of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for alleged illegal possession of foreign alcohol. The prosecution failed to prove its case because the five panch witnesses (neutral observers required during the search) did not support the prosecution's version, and critical chemical analysis reports were not produced as evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.
-
12-Mar-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.
-
12-Feb-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.
-
03-Jan-2026
Evidence
Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.
-
18-Nov-2025
Evidence
Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence
Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.
-
05-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 492/2025
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vaishali Dhanraj Pipare The court acquitted the accused, Vaishali Dhanraj Pipare, of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for alleged illegal possession of foreign alcohol. The prosecution failed to prove its case because the five panch witnesses (neutral observers required during the search) did not support the prosecution's version, and critical chemical analysis reports were not produced as evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts