STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PSO GADCHIROLI vs VAISHALI DHANRAJ PIPARE Advocate - N.S.Undirwade — 492/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd April 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHGA030008072025
e-Filing Number
03-07-2025
Filing Number
806/2025
Filing Date
05-07-2025
Registration No
492/2025
Registration Date
05-07-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gadchiroli
Judge
9-Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
909
Police Station
Gadchiroli
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PSO GADCHIROLI
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
VAISHALI DHANRAJ PIPARE Advocate - N.S.Undirwade
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.
Disposed
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 12-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 03-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-11-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vaishali Dhanraj Pipare The court acquitted the accused, Vaishali Dhanraj Pipare, of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for alleged illegal possession of foreign alcohol. The prosecution failed to prove its case because the five panch witnesses (neutral observers required during the search) did not support the prosecution's version, and critical chemical analysis reports were not produced as evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vaishali Dhanraj Pipare The court acquitted the accused, Vaishali Dhanraj Pipare, of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for alleged illegal possession of foreign alcohol. The prosecution failed to prove its case because the five panch witnesses (neutral observers required during the search) did not support the prosecution's version, and critical chemical analysis reports were not produced as evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts