Pranali Sandip Dudhe vs Sandip Jageshwar Dudhe Advocate - S.S.Barsinge — 30/2024
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
PWDVA Appln.
CNR: MHGA030007822024
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
e-Filing Number
05-08-2024
Filing Number
782/2024
Filing Date
06-08-2024
Registration No
30/2024
Registration Date
06-08-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gadchiroli
Judge
9-Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.
FIR Details
Police Station
Gadchiroli
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pranali Sandip Dudhe
Adv. UNDIRWADE DIPAK NANDKISHOR
Saksham Sandip Dudhe
Adv. UNDIRWADE DIPAK NANDKISHOR
Sara Sandip Dudhe
Adv. UNDIRWADE DIPAK NANDKISHOR
Respondent(s)
Sandip Jageshwar Dudhe Advocate - S.S.Barsinge
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Reconciliation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-02-2026 | Reconciliation |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Pranali Sandip Dudhe v. Sandip Jageshwar Dudhe (30/2024) The Gadchiroli Judicial Magistrate First Class partly allowed a domestic violence petition filed by a wife and two children against the husband under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court ordered the husband to pay Rs. 5,000 monthly interim maintenance to all three applicants from the date of the order, and issued a temporary protection order prohibiting him from committing domestic violence against the wife. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence and economic abuse, noting the wife had no income and the husband had failed to provide maintenance since July 2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Pranali Sandip Dudhe v. Sandip Jageshwar Dudhe (30/2024) The Gadchiroli Judicial Magistrate First Class partly allowed a domestic violence petition filed by a wife and two children against the husband under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court ordered the husband to pay Rs. 5,000 monthly interim maintenance to all three applicants from the date of the order, and issued a temporary protection order prohibiting him from committing domestic violence against the wife. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence and economic abuse, noting the wife had no income and the husband had failed to provide maintenance since July 2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts