STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PSO GADCHIROLI vs PRAFUL VINOD PAL Advocate - N.S.Undirwade — 430/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th May 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHGA030007192025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

22-06-2025

Filing Number

718/2025

Filing Date

24-06-2025

Registration No

430/2025

Registration Date

24-06-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gadchiroli

Judge

9-Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.

Decision Date

11th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

934

Police Station

Gadchiroli

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281
Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(A),98(c)

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PSO GADCHIROLI

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

PRAFUL VINOD PAL Advocate - N.S.Undirwade

Hearing History

Judge: 9-Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.

11-05-2026

Disposed

16-04-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

12-03-2026

Evidence

29-01-2026

Evidence

06-12-2025

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

11-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Praful Vinod Pal (Case 430/2025) Court Decision (May 11, 2026) The court acquitted the accused Praful Vinod Pal of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act sections 65(a) and 98(k), finding insufficient evidence that he illegally transported foreign liquor. The prosecution failed to establish its case, as the five panch (witness) signatories did not support the prosecution's allegations, and the seized liquor could not be definitively proven to be contraband. The court noted that without credible corroborating testimony from the panches and due to procedural deficiencies, the accused is entitled to acquittal. The bond was ordered to be cancelled, and the State directed to release any confiscated property to the accused after deducting applicable excise duties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Praful Vinod Pal (Case 430/2025) Court Decision (May 11, 2026) The court acquitted the accused Praful Vinod Pal of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act sections 65(a) and 98(k), finding insufficient evidence that he illegally transported foreign liquor. The prosecution failed to establish its case, as the five panch (witness) signatories did not support the prosecution's allegations, and the seized liquor could not be definitively proven to be contraband. The court noted that without credible corroborating testimony from the panches and due to procedural deficiencies, the accused is entitled to acquittal. The bond was ordered to be cancelled, and the State directed to release any confiscated property to the accused after deducting applicable excise duties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gadchiroli All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case