STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PSO GADCHIROLI vs PRAFUL VINOD PAL Advocate - N.S.Undirwade — 430/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHGA030007192025
e-Filing Number
22-06-2025
Filing Number
718/2025
Filing Date
24-06-2025
Registration No
430/2025
Registration Date
24-06-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gadchiroli
Judge
9-Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.
Decision Date
11th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
934
Police Station
Gadchiroli
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PSO GADCHIROLI
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
PRAFUL VINOD PAL Advocate - N.S.Undirwade
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.
Disposed
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 29-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-12-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Praful Vinod Pal (Case 430/2025) Court Decision (May 11, 2026) The court acquitted the accused Praful Vinod Pal of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act sections 65(a) and 98(k), finding insufficient evidence that he illegally transported foreign liquor. The prosecution failed to establish its case, as the five panch (witness) signatories did not support the prosecution's allegations, and the seized liquor could not be definitively proven to be contraband. The court noted that without credible corroborating testimony from the panches and due to procedural deficiencies, the accused is entitled to acquittal. The bond was ordered to be cancelled, and the State directed to release any confiscated property to the accused after deducting applicable excise duties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Praful Vinod Pal (Case 430/2025) Court Decision (May 11, 2026) The court acquitted the accused Praful Vinod Pal of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act sections 65(a) and 98(k), finding insufficient evidence that he illegally transported foreign liquor. The prosecution failed to establish its case, as the five panch (witness) signatories did not support the prosecution's allegations, and the seized liquor could not be definitively proven to be contraband. The court noted that without credible corroborating testimony from the panches and due to procedural deficiencies, the accused is entitled to acquittal. The bond was ordered to be cancelled, and the State directed to release any confiscated property to the accused after deducting applicable excise duties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts