Kiran Tukaram Gedam vs Tukaram Sitaram Gedam Advocate - P.J.Ghongde — 168/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 10th April 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHGA030007022024
e-Filing Number
01-07-2024
Filing Number
702/2024
Filing Date
02-07-2024
Registration No
168/2024
Registration Date
02-07-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gadchiroli
Judge
11-Joint Civil Judge SrDn and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Gadchiroli
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
Police Station
Armori
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kiran Tukaram Gedam
Adv. Nargisbano Akbarkha Pathan
Tanmay Tukaram Gedam
Adv. Nargisbano Akbarkha Pathan
Respondent(s)
Tukaram Sitaram Gedam Advocate - P.J.Ghongde
Hearing History
Judge: 11-Joint Civil Judge SrDn and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Gadchiroli
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 30-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 16-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 168/2024 Court Decision: The court partially allowed the petition filed by Kiran Tukaram Gedam and Tanmay Tukaram Gedam against Tukaram Sitaram Gedam. The petitioner (wife) sought maintenance for herself and her 4-year-old son after separation from her husband. The court found that the respondent, aged 28-30, possesses means of income (including agricultural land and daily labor work earning ₹500-1000 daily) and is capable of providing maintenance. Key Reasoning: The court found insufficient evidence of the respondent's financial incapacity and noted his failure to substantively contest the claims or provide satisfactory documentation. Despite the respondent's receipt of summons and subsequent court orders, he filed no proper response, weakening his position. The court awarded maintenance of ₹10,000 monthly to the petitioner and ₹5,000 towards court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 168/2024 Court Decision: The court partially allowed the petition filed by Kiran Tukaram Gedam and Tanmay Tukaram Gedam against Tukaram Sitaram Gedam. The petitioner (wife) sought maintenance for herself and her 4-year-old son after separation from her husband. The court found that the respondent, aged 28-30, possesses means of income (including agricultural land and daily labor work earning ₹500-1000 daily) and is capable of providing maintenance. Key Reasoning: The court found insufficient evidence of the respondent's financial incapacity and noted his failure to substantively contest the claims or provide satisfactory documentation. Despite the respondent's receipt of summons and subsequent court orders, he filed no proper response, weakening his position. The court awarded maintenance of ₹10,000 monthly to the petitioner and ₹5,000 towards court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts