Kiran Tukaram Gedam vs Tukaram Sitaram Gedam Advocate - P.J.Ghongde — 168/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 10th April 2026.

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHGA030007022024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

01-07-2024

Filing Number

702/2024

Filing Date

02-07-2024

Registration No

168/2024

Registration Date

02-07-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gadchiroli

Judge

11-Joint Civil Judge SrDn and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Gadchiroli

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

Police Station

Armori

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144

Petitioner(s)

Kiran Tukaram Gedam

Adv. Nargisbano Akbarkha Pathan

Tanmay Tukaram Gedam

Adv. Nargisbano Akbarkha Pathan

Respondent(s)

Tukaram Sitaram Gedam Advocate - P.J.Ghongde

Hearing History

Judge: 11-Joint Civil Judge SrDn and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Gadchiroli

10-04-2026

Disposed

09-04-2026

Judgment

30-03-2026

Judgment

16-03-2026

Judgment

12-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: 168/2024 Court Decision: The court partially allowed the petition filed by Kiran Tukaram Gedam and Tanmay Tukaram Gedam against Tukaram Sitaram Gedam. The petitioner (wife) sought maintenance for herself and her 4-year-old son after separation from her husband. The court found that the respondent, aged 28-30, possesses means of income (including agricultural land and daily labor work earning ₹500-1000 daily) and is capable of providing maintenance. Key Reasoning: The court found insufficient evidence of the respondent's financial incapacity and noted his failure to substantively contest the claims or provide satisfactory documentation. Despite the respondent's receipt of summons and subsequent court orders, he filed no proper response, weakening his position. The court awarded maintenance of ₹10,000 monthly to the petitioner and ₹5,000 towards court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 168/2024 Court Decision: The court partially allowed the petition filed by Kiran Tukaram Gedam and Tanmay Tukaram Gedam against Tukaram Sitaram Gedam. The petitioner (wife) sought maintenance for herself and her 4-year-old son after separation from her husband. The court found that the respondent, aged 28-30, possesses means of income (including agricultural land and daily labor work earning ₹500-1000 daily) and is capable of providing maintenance. Key Reasoning: The court found insufficient evidence of the respondent's financial incapacity and noted his failure to substantively contest the claims or provide satisfactory documentation. Despite the respondent's receipt of summons and subsequent court orders, he filed no proper response, weakening his position. The court awarded maintenance of ₹10,000 monthly to the petitioner and ₹5,000 towards court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gadchiroli All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case