Kiran Tukaram Gedam vs Tukaram Sitaram Gedam Advocate - P.J.Ghongde — 168/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHGA030007022024

e-Filing Number

01-07-2024

Filing Number

702/2024

Filing Date

02-Jul-2024

Registration No

168/2024

Registration Date

02-Jul-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gadchiroli

Judge

11-Joint Civil Judge SrDn and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Gadchiroli

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Armori

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kiran Tukaram Gedam

    Adv. Nargisbano Akbarkha Pathan

  2. 2.Tanmay Tukaram Gedam

    Adv. Nargisbano Akbarkha Pathan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Tukaram Sitaram Gedam Advocate - P.J.Ghongde

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Copy of Judgment

    Case Summary: 168/2024 Court Decision: The court partially allowed the petition filed by Kiran Tukaram Gedam and Tanmay Tukaram Gedam against Tukaram Sitaram Gedam. The petitioner (wife) sought maintenance for herself and her 4-year-old son after separation from her husband. The court found that the respondent, aged 28-30, possesses means of income (including agricultural land and daily labor work earning ₹500-1000 daily) and is capable of providing maintenance. Key Reasoning: The court found insufficient evidence of the respondent's financial incapacity and noted his failure to substantively contest the claims or provide satisfactory documentation. Despite the respondent's receipt of summons and subsequent court orders, he filed no proper response, weakening his position. The court awarded maintenance of ₹10,000 monthly to the petitioner and ₹5,000 towards court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Joint Civil Judge SrDn and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Gadchiroli

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    Joint Civil Judge SrDn and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Gadchiroli

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Gadchiroli.

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Gadchiroli.

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Gadchiroli.

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Gadchiroli.

  9. 24-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Gadchiroli.

  10. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Gadchiroli.

  11. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Gadchiroli.

  12. 29-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Gadchiroli.

  13. 17-Nov-2025

    Dismissal Order

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Gadchiroli.

  14. 27-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Gadchiroli.

  15. 13-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Gadchiroli.

  16. 13-Aug-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Gadchiroli.

  17. 04-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Gadchiroli.

  18. 10-May-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Gadchiroli.

  19. 19-Apr-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Gadchiroli.

  20. 20-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.

  21. 27-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.

  22. 23-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.

  23. 09-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.

  24. 19-Dec-2024

    Reply/Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.

  25. 05-Dec-2024

    Reply/Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.

  26. 16-Nov-2024

    Reply/Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.

  27. 17-Oct-2024

    Reply/Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.

  28. 23-Sep-2024

    Reply/Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.

  29. 12-Sep-2024

    Reply/Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.

  30. 22-Aug-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.

  31. 05-Aug-2024

    Steps

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.

  32. 02-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 02-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 168/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 168/2024 Court Decision: The court partially allowed the petition filed by Kiran Tukaram Gedam and Tanmay Tukaram Gedam against Tukaram Sitaram Gedam. The petitioner (wife) sought maintenance for herself and her 4-year-old son after separation from her husband. The court found that the respondent, aged 28-30, possesses means of income (including agricultural land and daily labor work earning ₹500-1000 daily) and is capable of providing maintenance. Key Reasoning: The court found insufficient evidence of the respondent's financial incapacity and noted his failure to substantively contest the claims or provide satisfactory documentation. Despite the respondent's receipt of summons and subsequent court orders, he filed no proper response, weakening his position. The court awarded maintenance of ₹10,000 monthly to the petitioner and ₹5,000 towards court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case