Shri Ajay Arun Chichghare vs State of Maharashtra through PSO Gadchiroli Advocate - APP — 42/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 18th March 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHGA030005492026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2026
Filing Number
549/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
42/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gadchiroli
Judge
9-Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
0199
Police Station
Gadchiroli
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri Ajay Arun Chichghare
Adv. Kukadkar Umesh Venunath
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Gadchiroli Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.
Disposed
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
The First Class Judicial Magistrate in Gadchiroli allowed petitioner Ajay Arun Chichghare's petition to recover his seized vehicle (UP-16-DB-0590) under criminal case 199/2026 filed under Maharashtra Prohibition Act sections 98, 83, and 65(a). The court rejected the police station's argument that the vehicle might be used for further crimes, ruling that the petitioner has a right to recover his property and directing the Gadchiroli police to return the vehicle upon submission of a damage compensation bond of ₹8,00,000 and completion of prescribed formalities including photographs and documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The First Class Judicial Magistrate in Gadchiroli allowed petitioner Ajay Arun Chichghare's petition to recover his seized vehicle (UP-16-DB-0590) under criminal case 199/2026 filed under Maharashtra Prohibition Act sections 98, 83, and 65(a). The court rejected the police station's argument that the vehicle might be used for further crimes, ruling that the petitioner has a right to recover his property and directing the Gadchiroli police to return the vehicle upon submission of a damage compensation bond of ₹8,00,000 and completion of prescribed formalities including photographs and documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts