Shri Ajay Arun Chichghare vs State of Maharashtra through PSO Gadchiroli Advocate - APP — 42/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHGA030005492026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

549/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

42/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gadchiroli

Judge

9-Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0199

Police Station

Gadchiroli

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shri Ajay Arun Chichghare

    Adv. Kukadkar Umesh Venunath

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Gadchiroli Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    The First Class Judicial Magistrate in Gadchiroli allowed petitioner Ajay Arun Chichghare's petition to recover his seized vehicle (UP-16-DB-0590) under criminal case 199/2026 filed under Maharashtra Prohibition Act sections 98, 83, and 65(a). The court rejected the police station's argument that the vehicle might be used for further crimes, ruling that the petitioner has a right to recover his property and directing the Gadchiroli police to return the vehicle upon submission of a damage compensation bond of ₹8,00,000 and completion of prescribed formalities including photographs and documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadchiroli.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 42/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The First Class Judicial Magistrate in Gadchiroli allowed petitioner Ajay Arun Chichghare's petition to recover his seized vehicle (UP-16-DB-0590) under criminal case 199/2026 filed under Maharashtra Prohibition Act sections 98, 83, and 65(a). The court rejected the police station's argument that the vehicle might be used for further crimes, ruling that the petitioner has a right to recover his property and directing the Gadchiroli police to return the vehicle upon submission of a damage compensation bond of ₹8,00,000 and completion of prescribed formalities including photographs and documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case