State of Maharashtra through P. S. O. Gadchiroli vs Pankaj Kishor Bagade Advocate - S.R.Thakre — 53/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,149,188,290,291,353,341. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHGA010005712021
Filing Number
425/2021
Filing Date
02-Aug-2021
Registration No
53/2021
Registration Date
02-Aug-2021
Court
District and Session Court , Gadchiroli
Judge
25-Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
469
Police Station
Gadchiroli
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra through P. S. O. Gadchiroli
Adv. DGP/AGP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pankaj Kishor Bagade Advocate - S.R.Thakre
-
2.Kunthaleshwar Vithal Undirwade
-
3.Uttam Maroti Nikode
-
4.Kailash Jairam Gavture
-
5.Shrikrushna Ramesh Gurunule
-
6.Rajat Shitaram Gurunule
-
7.Balaji Eshwar Chapale
-
8.Nitin Ravindra Chapale
-
9.Ravindra Arjun Thakur
-
10.Kartik Tukaram Kalbande
-
11.Balaji Shivram Zaizad
-
12.Diwakar Bhika Wadai
-
13.Anandrao Shrawan Chaaudhari
-
14.Ashok Mukhuru Dhanpole
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
Reply/Say
Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge
-
27-Jan-2026
Reply/Say
Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge
-
16-Dec-2025
Reply/Say
Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge
-
31-Oct-2025
Reply/Say
Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge
-
17-Sep-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
04-Aug-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
21-Jun-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
17-May-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
17-Apr-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
27-Mar-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
27-Feb-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
22-Jan-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
04-Dec-2024
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
06-Nov-2024
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
18-Sep-2024
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
03-Aug-2024
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
29-Jun-2024
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
18-May-2024
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
20-Apr-2024
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
14-Mar-2024
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
08-Feb-2024
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
21-Dec-2023
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
09-Nov-2023
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
10-Oct-2023
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
06-Sep-2023
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
02-Aug-2023
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
05-Jul-2023
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
07-Jun-2023
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
26-Apr-2023
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
27-Mar-2023
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
16-Feb-2023
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
29-Dec-2022
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
23-Nov-2022
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
12-Oct-2022
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
16-Sep-2022
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
22-Jul-2022
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
01-Jul-2022
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
13-May-2022
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
31-Mar-2022
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
24-Jan-2022
Appearance
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
23-Nov-2021
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 53/2021 Outcome: Discharge application REJECTED Rajat Sitaram Gurnule sought discharge under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code, arguing insufficient evidence against him for alleged offences under IPC Sections 143, 188, 290, 291, 341, 353 read with 149, and Mumbai Police Act Section 135. The court found strong prima facie evidence demonstrating Gurnule's active involvement in obstructing police during a Durga Immersion procession on 20.10.2018, including preventing DJ seizure and blocking police transport of seized materials worth Rs. 4,32,800. The court rejected his arguments that police lacked authority to seize the sound system and discharged its obligation under settled law by applying Section 149 IPC (common object liability). The emotional appeal regarding potential job loss was dismissed as irrelevant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Nov-2021
Appearance
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
18-Nov-2021
Order on Exh
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
17-Nov-2021
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
17-Nov-2021
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
17-Nov-2021
Argument on Exh.____Unready
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
15-Nov-2021
Order on Exh
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
22-Sep-2021
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli
-
01-Sep-2021
Reply/Say
Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge
-
06-Aug-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Aug-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 53/2021
Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 53/2021 Outcome: Discharge application REJECTED Rajat Sitaram Gurnule sought discharge under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code, arguing insufficient evidence against him for alleged offences under IPC Sections 143, 188, 290, 291, 341, 353 read with 149, and Mumbai Police Act Section 135. The court found strong prima facie evidence demonstrating Gurnule's active involvement in obstructing police during a Durga Immersion procession on 20.10.2018, including preventing DJ seizure and blocking police transport of seized materials worth Rs. 4,32,800. The court rejected his arguments that police lacked authority to seize the sound system and discharged its obligation under settled law by applying Section 149 IPC (common object liability). The emotional appeal regarding potential job loss was dismissed as irrelevant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts