State of Maharashtra through P. S. O. Gadchiroli vs Pankaj Kishor Bagade Advocate - S.R.Thakre — 53/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,149,188,290,291,353,341. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHGA010005712021
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
425/2021
Filing Date
02-08-2021
Registration No
53/2021
Registration Date
02-08-2021
Court
District and Session Court , Gadchiroli
Judge
25-Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
469
Police Station
Gadchiroli
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through P. S. O. Gadchiroli
Adv. DGP/AGP
Respondent(s)
Pankaj Kishor Bagade Advocate - S.R.Thakre
Kunthaleshwar Vithal Undirwade
Uttam Maroti Nikode
Kailash Jairam Gavture
Shrikrushna Ramesh Gurunule
Rajat Shitaram Gurunule
Balaji Eshwar Chapale
Nitin Ravindra Chapale
Ravindra Arjun Thakur
Kartik Tukaram Kalbande
Balaji Shivram Zaizad
Diwakar Bhika Wadai
Anandrao Shrawan Chaaudhari
Ashok Mukhuru Dhanpole
Hearing History
Judge: 25-Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 12-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 27-01-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 16-12-2025 | Reply/Say |
| 31-10-2025 | Reply/Say |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 53/2021 Outcome: Discharge application REJECTED Rajat Sitaram Gurnule sought discharge under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code, arguing insufficient evidence against him for alleged offences under IPC Sections 143, 188, 290, 291, 341, 353 read with 149, and Mumbai Police Act Section 135. The court found strong prima facie evidence demonstrating Gurnule's active involvement in obstructing police during a Durga Immersion procession on 20.10.2018, including preventing DJ seizure and blocking police transport of seized materials worth Rs. 4,32,800. The court rejected his arguments that police lacked authority to seize the sound system and discharged its obligation under settled law by applying Section 149 IPC (common object liability). The emotional appeal regarding potential job loss was dismissed as irrelevant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 53/2021 Outcome: Discharge application REJECTED Rajat Sitaram Gurnule sought discharge under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code, arguing insufficient evidence against him for alleged offences under IPC Sections 143, 188, 290, 291, 341, 353 read with 149, and Mumbai Police Act Section 135. The court found strong prima facie evidence demonstrating Gurnule's active involvement in obstructing police during a Durga Immersion procession on 20.10.2018, including preventing DJ seizure and blocking police transport of seized materials worth Rs. 4,32,800. The court rejected his arguments that police lacked authority to seize the sound system and discharged its obligation under settled law by applying Section 149 IPC (common object liability). The emotional appeal regarding potential job loss was dismissed as irrelevant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts