State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. Armori vs Subhash Hanumant Deshmukh Advocate - P.P.Bramhanwade — 4/2019

Case under Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)(W)(i)(ii),3(2)(v). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd April 2026.

Atro.Spl.Case

CNR: MHGA010005592019

Case disposed

Filing Number

400/2019

Filing Date

15-04-2019

Registration No

4/2019

Registration Date

15-04-2019

Court

District and Session Court , Gadchiroli

Judge

25-Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

02nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

51

Police Station

Armori

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)(W)(i)(ii),3(2)(v)
INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 376

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. Armori

Adv. DGP/AGP

Respondent(s)

Subhash Hanumant Deshmukh Advocate - P.P.Bramhanwade

Hearing History

Judge: 25-Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

02-04-2026

Disposed

01-04-2026

Judgment

18-03-2026

Judgment

12-03-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

26-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Final Orders / Judgements

02-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Subhash Hanumant Deshmukh was acquitted of rape charges under IPC Section 376 and atrocities charges under SC/ST Prevention Act 1989. The court found the victim (prosecution's star witness) turned hostile and failed to depose against the accused, while medical evidence was weak with only speculative opinions about sexual contact, insufficient to prove the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Subhash Hanumant Deshmukh was acquitted of rape charges under IPC Section 376 and atrocities charges under SC/ST Prevention Act 1989. The court found the victim (prosecution's star witness) turned hostile and failed to depose against the accused, while medical evidence was weak with only speculative opinions about sexual contact, insufficient to prove the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court , Gadchiroli All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case