State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Officer Desaiganj vs Vikas Janardan Borkar Advocate - R.S.Donadkar — 38/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,201. Status: Awaiting Muddemal. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

Awaiting Muddemal Next hearing 20-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Sessions Case

CNR: MHGA010004752024

Filing Number

266/2024

Filing Date

29-Jun-2024

Registration No

38/2024

Registration Date

29-Jun-2024

Court

District and Session Court , Gadchiroli

Judge

24-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

65

Police Station

Desaiganj

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 302,201

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Officer Desaiganj

    Adv. DGP/AGP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vikas Janardan Borkar Advocate - R.S.Donadkar

Case History

  1. 20-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-May-2026

    Awaiting Muddemal

    District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Muddemal

    Principal District And Sessions Judge Gadchiroli.

  4. 29-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Muddemal

    Principal District And Sessions Judge Gadchiroli.

  5. 29-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Muddemal

    Principal District And Sessions Judge Gadchiroli.

  6. 05-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Muddemal

    Principal District And Sessions Judge Gadchiroli.

  7. 18-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Muddemal

    Principal District And Sessions Judge Gadchiroli.

  8. 19-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    Principal District And Sessions Judge Gadchiroli.

  9. 03-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    Principal District And Sessions Judge Gadchiroli.

  10. 15-May-2025

    Appearance

    Principal District And Sessions Judge Gadchiroli.

  11. 10-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    Principal District And Sessions Judge Gadchiroli.

  12. 23-Jan-2025

    Appearance

    Principal District And Sessions Judge Gadchiroli.

  13. 21-Dec-2024

    Appearance

    Principal District And Sessions Judge Gadchiroli.

  14. 08-Nov-2024

    Appearance

    Principal District And Sessions Judge Gadchiroli.

  15. 20-Sep-2024

    Appearance

    Principal District And Sessions Judge Gadchiroli.

  16. 05-Sep-2024

    Appearance

    Principal District And Sessions Judge Gadchiroli.

  17. 04-Sep-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 38/2024 Vikas Janardan Borkar was granted conditional bail in a murder case (IPC Sections 302, 201) involving a death initially registered as accidental. The Sessions Judge allowed his bail application, noting investigation completion, circumstantial evidence basis, trial delay likelihood, and the accused's clean criminal record. Bail conditions: Rs. 30,000 personal recognizance and surety; accused must not tamper with evidence or threaten witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 04-Sep-2024

    Filing of Surety

    Principal District And Sessions Judge Gadchiroli.

  19. 29-Aug-2024

    Reply/Say

    Principal District And Sessions Judge Gadchiroli.

  20. 16-Aug-2024

    Reply/Say

    Principal District And Sessions Judge Gadchiroli.

  21. 12-Aug-2024

    Filing of Vakilpatra

    Principal District And Sessions Judge Gadchiroli.

  22. 08-Aug-2024

    Filing of Vakilpatra

    Principal District And Sessions Judge Gadchiroli.

  23. 25-Jul-2024

    Filing of Vakilpatra

    Principal District And Sessions Judge Gadchiroli.

  24. 01-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 29-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 38/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 38/2024 Vikas Janardan Borkar was granted conditional bail in a murder case (IPC Sections 302, 201) involving a death initially registered as accidental. The Sessions Judge allowed his bail application, noting investigation completion, circumstantial evidence basis, trial delay likelihood, and the accused's clean criminal record. Bail conditions: Rs. 30,000 personal recognizance and surety; accused must not tamper with evidence or threaten witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case