Pinku Urf Pankaj Narthraman Nirankari vs State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Officer, Desaiganj — 41/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln.

CNR: MHGA010002072026

e-Filing Number

18-03-2026

Filing Number

133/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

41/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Gadchiroli

Judge

1-Principal District And Sessions Judge Gadchiroli.

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

136

Police Station

Desaiganj

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pinku Urf Pankaj Narthraman Nirankari

    Adv. Ayesha Iqbal Shekhani

  2. 2.Govinda Parmanand Nagwani

    Adv. Ayesha Iqbal Shekhani

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Officer, Desaiganj

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    The Sessions Judge granted bail to both applicants in a food safety case involving contraband scented tobacco. Finding weak evidence against applicant Govinda Nagwani (only an inadmissible confession linking him to the purchase) and noting the offences as nominal, the court allowed the bail application with conditions including Rs. 25,000 PR bonds, weekly police station attendance, and compliance with BNSS Section 480(5). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District And Sessions Judge Gadchiroli.

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 41/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge granted bail to both applicants in a food safety case involving contraband scented tobacco. Finding weak evidence against applicant Govinda Nagwani (only an inadmissible confession linking him to the purchase) and noting the offences as nominal, the court allowed the bail application with conditions including Rs. 25,000 PR bonds, weekly police station attendance, and compliance with BNSS Section 480(5). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case