State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Officer, Pendhari vs Vilas Jadhao Usendi Advocate - Sanjay S. Bhat — 19/2025

Case under The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 8,12. Status: List of Witness. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

List of Witness Next hearing 25-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Spl.Case

CNR: MHGA010002062025

Filing Number

135/2025

Filing Date

15-Mar-2025

Registration No

19/2025

Registration Date

15-Mar-2025

Court

District and Session Court , Gadchiroli

Judge

24-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

01

Police Station

Pendhri

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 8,12
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,78,74,332,351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Officer, Pendhari

    Adv. DGP/AGP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vilas Jadhao Usendi Advocate - Sanjay S. Bhat

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-May-2026

    List of Witness

    District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    List of Witness

    District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    List of Witness

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    List of Witness

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  6. 17-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  7. 29-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  8. 21-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  9. 18-Nov-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Vilas Jadhav Usendi (19/2025) Outcome: Bail Granted The court granted bail to accused Vilas Jadhav Usendi (age 23) in a POCSO case involving allegations that he pushed a victim off a hostel terrace on January 9, 2025, causing injuries. The judge found the prosecution case "dubious and not easily believable," citing suspicious circumstances including an 8-day reporting delay, the implausibility of the accused accessing a hostel at midnight, and the victim's prior failure to report alleged year-long harassment. The accused was released on Rs. 50,000 bail with one surety, subject to conditions prohibiting contact with the victim and leaving Maharashtra. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 18-Nov-2025

    Filing of Surety

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  11. 17-Nov-2025

    Order on Exh

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  12. 13-Nov-2025

    Order on Exh

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  13. 07-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  14. 03-Nov-2025

    Reply Unready

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  15. 27-Oct-2025

    Reply/Say

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  16. 17-Oct-2025

    Reply/Say

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  17. 08-Oct-2025

    Reply/Say

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  18. 25-Sep-2025

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  19. 12-Sep-2025

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  20. 30-Aug-2025

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  21. 19-Aug-2025

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  22. 14-Aug-2025

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  23. 07-Aug-2025

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  24. 31-Jul-2025

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  25. 17-Jul-2025

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  26. 11-Jul-2025

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  27. 04-Jul-2025

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  28. 27-Jun-2025

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  29. 20-Jun-2025

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  30. 12-Jun-2025

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  31. 05-Jun-2025

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  32. 22-May-2025

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  33. 15-May-2025

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  34. 08-May-2025

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  35. 03-May-2025

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  36. 29-Apr-2025

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  37. 22-Apr-2025

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  38. 15-Apr-2025

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  39. 07-Apr-2025

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  40. 24-Mar-2025

    Production of Accused

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  41. 15-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 15-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 19/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Vilas Jadhav Usendi (19/2025) Outcome: Bail Granted The court granted bail to accused Vilas Jadhav Usendi (age 23) in a POCSO case involving allegations that he pushed a victim off a hostel terrace on January 9, 2025, causing injuries. The judge found the prosecution case "dubious and not easily believable," citing suspicious circumstances including an 8-day reporting delay, the implausibility of the accused accessing a hostel at midnight, and the victim's prior failure to report alleged year-long harassment. The accused was released on Rs. 50,000 bail with one surety, subject to conditions prohibiting contact with the victim and leaving Maharashtra. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case