State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. Regadi vs Subrato Pares Das and others 1 Advocate - P.C.Sammaddar — 18/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 20(b),(ii)(b),8(c). Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 18th July 2026.

Appearance Next hearing 18-Jul-2026 this date has passed

Spl.Case

CNR: MHGA010001692026

Filing Number

107/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

18/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Gadchiroli

Judge

25-Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

02

Police Station

Regadi

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 20(b),(ii)(b),8(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. Regadi

    Adv. DGP/AGP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Subrato Pares Das and others 1 Advocate - P.C.Sammaddar

  2. 2.Chandrashekhar Ashok Dhali

Case History

  1. 18-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-May-2026

    Appearance

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  3. 13-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Subrato Pares Das (18/2026) Outcome: Bail GRANTED The court allowed the bail application of accused Chandrashekhar Ashok Dhali, arrested on 07.01.2026 for NDPS violations (Sections 20(b)(ii)(b) and 8(c)). The judge found multiple procedural irregularities including improper weighing of seized ganja (1,494 gms police vs. 1,570 gms judicial inventory), failure to separate flowering tops before weighing, violation of arrest ground communication requirements, and chain-of-custody lapses. Since the charge-sheet was filed and the offense carried maximum 10-year imprisonment (not life/death), the court granted bail of Rs. 50,000 with surety, subject to conditions including non-absconding and trial attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 13-May-2026

    Production of Accused

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  5. 12-May-2026

    Order on Exh

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  6. 11-May-2026

    Production of Accused

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  7. 07-May-2026

    Production of Accused

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  8. 06-May-2026

    Order

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  9. 02-May-2026

    Hearing

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  10. 27-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  11. 22-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  12. 20-Apr-2026

    Appearance

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  13. 15-Apr-2026

    Appearance

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  14. 10-Apr-2026

    Appearance

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  15. 09-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  16. 09-Apr-2026

    Filing of Surety

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  17. 08-Apr-2026

    Order

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  18. 07-Apr-2026

    Order

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  19. 02-Apr-2026

    Order

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  20. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  21. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  22. 16-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  23. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 18/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Subrato Pares Das (18/2026) Outcome: Bail GRANTED The court allowed the bail application of accused Chandrashekhar Ashok Dhali, arrested on 07.01.2026 for NDPS violations (Sections 20(b)(ii)(b) and 8(c)). The judge found multiple procedural irregularities including improper weighing of seized ganja (1,494 gms police vs. 1,570 gms judicial inventory), failure to separate flowering tops before weighing, violation of arrest ground communication requirements, and chain-of-custody lapses. Since the charge-sheet was filed and the offense carried maximum 10-year imprisonment (not life/death), the court granted bail of Rs. 50,000 with surety, subject to conditions including non-absconding and trial attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case