State of Maharashtra through PSO Gadchiroli vs RANJITSING CHANDASING TAAK — 19/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(1), 351(2). Status: Awaiting Muddemal. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Awaiting Muddemal Next hearing 25-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Sessions Case

CNR: MHGA010001632026

e-Filing Number

03-02-2026

Filing Number

102/2026

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

19/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Gadchiroli

Judge

24-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(1), 351(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Gadchiroli

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RANJITSING CHANDASING TAAK

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Awaiting Muddemal

    District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  3. 30-May-2026

    Awaiting Muddemal

    District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  4. 18-May-2026

    Awaiting Muddemal

    District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  5. 04-May-2026

    Awaiting Muddemal

    District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  6. 20-Apr-2026

    Awaiting Muddemal

    District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  7. 06-Apr-2026

    Charge

    District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge Gadchiroli

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 19/2026 Outcome: Bail application REJECTED Ranjitsingh Chandasing Tak sought bail in a rape case involving charges under BNS Sections 64(1) and 351(2). The Sessions Judge rejected the application, finding prima facie evidence that the accused forcibly raped an adult victim on 10.12.2025 after coercing her with threats to share compromising photographs. Mobile phone records and the victim's corroborated statement established the accused made repeated contact attempts post-incident, contradicting his claim of merely obtaining her number to report her love affair to parents. The court found the accused guilty of serious offences and denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 18-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Principal District And Sessions Judge Gadchiroli.

  10. 11-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Principal District And Sessions Judge Gadchiroli.

  11. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 03-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 19/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 19/2026 Outcome: Bail application REJECTED Ranjitsingh Chandasing Tak sought bail in a rape case involving charges under BNS Sections 64(1) and 351(2). The Sessions Judge rejected the application, finding prima facie evidence that the accused forcibly raped an adult victim on 10.12.2025 after coercing her with threats to share compromising photographs. Mobile phone records and the victim's corroborated statement established the accused made repeated contact attempts post-incident, contradicting his claim of merely obtaining her number to report her love affair to parents. The court found the accused guilty of serious offences and denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case