State of Maharashtra vs Pundlik Sawaji Madavi Advocate - P.P.Bramhanwade — 1/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,329,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHGA010000162018
Filing Number
10/2018
Filing Date
01-01-2018
Registration No
1/2018
Registration Date
01-01-2018
Court
District and Session Court , Gadchiroli
Judge
25-Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
48
Police Station
Kurkheda
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. DGP/AGP
Respondent(s)
Pundlik Sawaji Madavi Advocate - P.P.Bramhanwade
Madhukar Sawaji Madavi
Adv. P.P.Bramhanwade
Ravi @ Ravindra Chintaman Madavi
Adv. P.P.Bramhanwade
Hearing History
Judge: 25-Ad-hoc District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 01-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Pundlik Sawaji Madavi & Others (Sessions Case 1/2018) The court acquitted accused Pundlik Saoji Madavi and Ravi @ Ravindra Chintaman Madavi of charges under IPC Sections 324 and 329 r/w Section 34 (causing hurt and grievous hurt in furtherance of common intention). The judge found critical gaps in prosecution evidence: uncorroborated victim testimony, panch witnesses turned hostile, key material witnesses (victim's wife and son) not examined, no mention of alleged weapon in victim's statement, and missing elements of Section 329 (extortion intent). Proceedings abated against deceased accused Madhukar Saoji Madavi. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Pundlik Sawaji Madavi & Others (Sessions Case 1/2018) The court acquitted accused Pundlik Saoji Madavi and Ravi @ Ravindra Chintaman Madavi of charges under IPC Sections 324 and 329 r/w Section 34 (causing hurt and grievous hurt in furtherance of common intention). The judge found critical gaps in prosecution evidence: uncorroborated victim testimony, panch witnesses turned hostile, key material witnesses (victim's wife and son) not examined, no mention of alleged weapon in victim's statement, and missing elements of Section 329 (extortion intent). Proceedings abated against deceased accused Madhukar Saoji Madavi. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts