Prakash Magan Patil Through General Attorney Savita Prakash Patil vs Pravin Suklal Chavhan Advocate - Sonawane Nikhil S. — 300/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37,39. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 20-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHDH070026392023

Filing Number

1019/2023

Filing Date

16-Aug-2023

Registration No

300/2023

Registration Date

16-Aug-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shirpur

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 37,39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Prakash Magan Patil Through General Attorney Savita Prakash Patil

    Adv. Jain H.M.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pravin Suklal Chavhan Advocate - Sonawane Nikhil S.

  2. 2.Dipali Pravin Chavhan

  3. 3.Gramsevak, Grampanchayat, Shingave

Case History

  1. 20-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  3. 16-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  4. 22-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  5. 24-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  6. 30-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  7. 10-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  8. 23-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  9. 07-Jul-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The plaintiff's application to amend the plaint by adding a mandatory injunction prayer (in addition to the existing perpetual injunction prayer) was allowed. The court found that the amendment was justified because the defendants constructed a structure adjacent to the plaintiff's window after the suit was instituted, necessitating the additional relief. The plaintiff must file the amended plaint before the next date and pay the requisite court fees and stamp duty; no costs were imposed on either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 07-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  11. 25-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  12. 27-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  13. 17-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  14. 13-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  15. 05-Dec-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  16. 11-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  17. 23-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  18. 12-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  19. 19-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  20. 31-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  21. 10-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  22. 10-May-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  23. 15-Apr-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  24. 27-Mar-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  25. 21-Feb-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  26. 17-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  27. 04-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  28. 18-Dec-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  29. 23-Nov-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  30. 01-Nov-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  31. 23-Oct-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  32. 12-Oct-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  33. 05-Oct-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  34. 30-Sep-2023

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  35. 25-Sep-2023

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  36. 18-Sep-2023

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  37. 16-Sep-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  38. 13-Sep-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  39. 11-Sep-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  40. 06-Sep-2023

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  41. 04-Sep-2023

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

  42. 16-Aug-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  43. 16-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  44. 16-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 300/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The plaintiff's application to amend the plaint by adding a mandatory injunction prayer (in addition to the existing perpetual injunction prayer) was allowed. The court found that the amendment was justified because the defendants constructed a structure adjacent to the plaintiff's window after the suit was instituted, necessitating the additional relief. The plaintiff must file the amended plaint before the next date and pay the requisite court fees and stamp duty; no costs were imposed on either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case