State of Maharashtra -(Shirpur City Police Station) vs Gopal Premsing Rajput — 716/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHDH070023132025

Filing Number

1275/2025

Filing Date

12-Aug-2025

Registration No

716/2025

Registration Date

12-Aug-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shirpur

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

258

Police Station

Shirpur City

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E

Petitioner(s)

1.State of Maharashtra -(Shirpur City Police Station)

Adv. A.P.P. for State

Respondent(s)

1.Gopal Premsing Rajput

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
09-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

The Judicial Magistrate First Class discharged accused Gopal Premsing Rajput in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, due to the prosecution's failure to file the chemical analysis report on record. The court found no prospects of success for the prosecution without this crucial evidence and ruled that continuing the proceedings would serve no good purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
09-Mar-2026

Disposed

Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur
17-Feb-2026

Awaiting Summons

Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur
13-Nov-2025

Awaiting Summons

Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur
12-Aug-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
12-Aug-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 716/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate First Class discharged accused Gopal Premsing Rajput in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, due to the prosecution's failure to file the chemical analysis report on record. The court found no prospects of success for the prosecution without this crucial evidence and ruled that continuing the proceedings would serve no good purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.