State of Maharashtra - ( Shirpur Taluka Police Station) vs Pandit Janglya Pawara — 442/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHDH070014542025

Filing Number

753/2025

Filing Date

06-May-2025

Registration No

442/2025

Registration Date

06-May-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shirpur

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

259

Police Station

Shirpur Taluka Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E

Petitioner(s)

1.State of Maharashtra - ( Shirpur Taluka Police Station)

Adv. A.P.P. for State

Respondent(s)

1.Pandit Janglya Pawara

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
09-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

The court discharged the accused Pandit Janglya Pawara and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, because the chemical analysis report essential for the prosecution's case under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 was never filed on record. The court found that without this crucial evidence, the prosecution had no reasonable chance of success, making it futile to keep the matter pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
09-Mar-2026

Disposed

Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur
27-Nov-2025

Awaiting Summons

Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur
02-Sep-2025

Awaiting Summons

Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shirpur
06-May-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
06-May-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 442/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged the accused Pandit Janglya Pawara and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, because the chemical analysis report essential for the prosecution's case under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 was never filed on record. The court found that without this crucial evidence, the prosecution had no reasonable chance of success, making it futile to keep the matter pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.