Raju Jayram Brihade vs Kishor Zipa Brihade Advocate - Sonawane Kishor M. — 143/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 38,39. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHDH070009552022
Next Hearing
07th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
422/2022
Filing Date
25-03-2022
Registration No
143/2022
Registration Date
25-03-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Shirpur
Judge
2-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Raju Jayram Brihade
Adv. Chavan Nilesh A.
Nana Jayram Birhade
Namdev Jayram Birhade
Latabai Namdev Shirsath
Pushpabai Vyankatrao Shirsath
Sushilabai Shriram Birhade
Ashok Shriram Birhade
Vijay Shriram Birhade
Kailas Shriram Birhade
Ushabai Ravindra More
Respondent(s)
Kishor Zipa Brihade Advocate - Sonawane Kishor M.
mukanda Zipa Birhade
Aashabai Vasant Birhade
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirpur
Written Statement
Written Statement
Written Statement
Written Statement
Written Statement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Written Statement | |
| 09-03-2026 | Written Statement | |
| 07-02-2026 | Written Statement | |
| 19-01-2026 | Written Statement | |
| 07-01-2026 | Written Statement |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed by Defendants No. 2 and 3 to set aside the order proceeding the suit without their written statement was allowed. The court condoned the delay in filing the written statement, finding the defendants' reason (unavailability of necessary documents) condonable and recognizing that denying them a chance to file would deny them the right to contest the suit on merits. However, the court imposed cost of Rs. 1,000 on the defendants (to be paid to plaintiffs) to compensate for the inconvenience caused by the delay, with the written statement to be taken on record only after payment of this cost. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed by Defendants No. 2 and 3 to set aside the order proceeding the suit without their written statement was allowed. The court condoned the delay in filing the written statement, finding the defendants' reason (unavailability of necessary documents) condonable and recognizing that denying them a chance to file would deny them the right to contest the suit on merits. However, the court imposed cost of Rs. 1,000 on the defendants (to be paid to plaintiffs) to compensate for the inconvenience caused by the delay, with the written statement to be taken on record only after payment of this cost. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts