Sunil Gajmal Sonawane vs No Party — 41/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHDH070000952026

e-Filing Number

05-01-2026

Filing Number

50/2026

Filing Date

07-Jan-2026

Registration No

41/2026

Registration Date

07-Jan-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shirpur

Judge

2-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirpur

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sunil Gajmal Sonawane

    Adv. Kulkarni Prabhakar D.

  2. 2.Suhas Gajmal Sonawane

    Adv. Prabhakar Dadabhau Kulkarni

  3. 3.Vikas Gajmal Sonawane(Legal Heir)

    Adv. Prabhakar Dadabhau Kulkarni3.

  4. 4.Sagar Vikas Sonawane

    Adv. Prabhakar Dadabhau Kulkarni3.

  5. 5.Vrushali Kiran Mali / Gandhille

    Adv. Prabhakar Dadabhau Kulkarni3.

  6. 6.Vinita Samir Pandhare

    Adv. Prabhakar Dadabhau Kulkarni

  7. 7.Vishwas Gajmal Sonawane(Legal Heir)

    Adv. Prabhakar Dadabhau Kulkarni4.

  8. 8.Sindhumati Vishwas Sonawane

    Adv. Prabhakar Dadabhau Kulkarni4.

  9. 9.Vidya Ramesh Ekatpure

    Adv. Prabhakar Dadabhau Kulkarni4.

  10. 10.Milind Vishwas Sonawane

    Adv. Prabhakar Dadabhau Kulkarni4.

  11. 11.Amit Vishwas Sonawane

    Adv. Prabhakar Dadabhau Kulkarni

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.No Party

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary The court partially allowed the application and recognized Sunil Gajmal Sonawane, Suhas Gajmal Sonawane, Vikas Gajmal Sonawane (deceased), and Vishwas Gajmal Sonawane (deceased) as legal heirs of Gajmal Dalpat Mali under Section 2 of Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827. However, the court excluded the applicants who were descendants of predeceased sons (Vikas and Vishwas) as they could not inherit directly from the original deceased under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The court issued legal heirship certificates to the four recognized heirs, noting that such certificates establish formal recognition but do not confer property rights without following proper succession procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirpur

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Public Notice/Proclamation

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirpur

  5. 07-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 41/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court partially allowed the application and recognized Sunil Gajmal Sonawane, Suhas Gajmal Sonawane, Vikas Gajmal Sonawane (deceased), and Vishwas Gajmal Sonawane (deceased) as legal heirs of Gajmal Dalpat Mali under Section 2 of Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827. However, the court excluded the applicants who were descendants of predeceased sons (Vikas and Vishwas) as they could not inherit directly from the original deceased under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The court issued legal heirship certificates to the four recognized heirs, noting that such certificates establish formal recognition but do not confer property rights without following proper succession procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case