The State of Maharashtra vs Bhimrao Shamrao Patil — 98/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 435,506,. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHDH060013622022
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1034/2022
Filing Date
29-08-2022
Registration No
98/2022
Registration Date
29-08-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Shindkheda
Judge
6-Joint Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C Shindkheda
FIR Details
FIR Number
143
Police Station
Shindkheda
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P. for State
Respondent(s)
Bhimrao Shamrao Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Joint Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C Shindkheda
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 23-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 03-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 12-01-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Criminal Case No. 98/2022, Witness Examination Order The court recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of Witness No. 1 (Latish Shivaji Parvar, age 52, farmer from Shindkheda, Dhule district) in a criminal case involving alleged crop burning. The witness testified that the accused burned his sugarcane field on 26.04.2022, causing approximately ₹4 lakh in damages, and that the accused refused compensation when confronted. The cross-examination challenged the credibility of the witness's account and specific claims. The court proceedings were completed on 03.04.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Criminal Case No. 98/2022, Witness Examination Order The court recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of Witness No. 1 (Latish Shivaji Parvar, age 52, farmer from Shindkheda, Dhule district) in a criminal case involving alleged crop burning. The witness testified that the accused burned his sugarcane field on 26.04.2022, causing approximately ₹4 lakh in damages, and that the accused refused compensation when confronted. The cross-examination challenged the credibility of the witness's account and specific claims. The court proceedings were completed on 03.04.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts