Shital Maharu Patil etc 1 vs Maharu Bhagwan Patil etc 10 Advocate - सोनवणे मि. दे., N. A Chavan — 67/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section cpc. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHDH060012782018
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
389/2018
Filing Date
08-10-2018
Registration No
67/2018
Registration Date
08-10-2018
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Shindkheda
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shital Maharu Patil etc 1
Adv. Marathe B. Z.
Chaitali @ Charubala Maharu Patil
Respondent(s)
Maharu Bhagwan Patil etc 10 Advocate - सोनवणे मि. दे., N. A Chavan
Pitambar Bhagwan Patil
Adv. मराठे शारदा म.
Bhatabai Ratilal Patil
Adv. मराठे शारदा म.
Surekha Manohar Patil
Adv. मराठे शारदा म.
Nagraj Aadhar Patil
Adv. मराठे शारदा म.
Late- Kasubai Padurang Patil(Legal Heir)
Late- Kevalbai Manga Patil(Legal Heir)
Aarostolbai Madhukar Patil
Late- Bababai Suresh Patil(Legal Heir)
Chhabibai Ratan Patil
Ratnabai Dangal Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 29-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 15-12-2025 | Evidence | |
| 15-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the application and restored the suit against defendant No.8, which had been previously dismissed for want of steps. The Judicial Magistrate held that to avoid multiplicity of suits in this partition, maintenance, and separate possession matter, the suit could be restored under Section 151 of the CPC, accepting the plaintiffs' contention that COVID-19 prevented them from taking timely steps. The plaintiffs are directed to take effective steps without fail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the application and restored the suit against defendant No.8, which had been previously dismissed for want of steps. The Judicial Magistrate held that to avoid multiplicity of suits in this partition, maintenance, and separate possession matter, the suit could be restored under Section 151 of the CPC, accepting the plaintiffs' contention that COVID-19 prevented them from taking timely steps. The plaintiffs are directed to take effective steps without fail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts