Madhuri Jignesh Satote Bhoi Thro.Surekha Sanjay Bhoi vs Jignesh Uttam Satote @ Bhoi — 246/2023
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 09th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHDH060012112023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
828/2023
Filing Date
12-10-2023
Registration No
246/2023
Registration Date
12-10-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Shindkheda
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Madhuri Jignesh Satote Bhoi Thro.Surekha Sanjay Bhoi
Adv. Bhoi Sunil M.
Respondent(s)
Jignesh Uttam Satote @ Bhoi
Uttam Ramu
Bharti Uttam Satote @ Bhoi
Savita Ramu Sathe @ Bhoi
Varsha Harish Khedkar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
Disposed
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 30-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 17-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 12-09-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 25-07-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Civil Judge Junior Division at Shindkheda dismissed Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 246 of 2023 filed by Madhuri Jignesh Satote against Jignesh Uttam Satote for want of prosecution under Section 256 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The court found that the applicant and her advocate were repeatedly absent, had not taken any steps since April 10, 2025, and despite multiple opportunities, showed no intention to proceed with the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Civil Judge Junior Division at Shindkheda dismissed Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 246 of 2023 filed by Madhuri Jignesh Satote against Jignesh Uttam Satote for want of prosecution under Section 256 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The court found that the applicant and her advocate were repeatedly absent, had not taken any steps since April 10, 2025, and despite multiple opportunities, showed no intention to proceed with the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts