Hiraman Tapiram Marathe vs Madhukar Krishna Chaudhary Advocate - Jadhav Subhash N., Jadhav Subhash N. — 53/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section recovery. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHDH060010642019
Next Hearing
04th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
301/2019
Filing Date
18-10-2019
Registration No
53/2019
Registration Date
18-10-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Shindkheda
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hiraman Tapiram Marathe
Adv. Marathe B. Z.
Respondent(s)
Madhukar Krishna Chaudhary Advocate - Jadhav Subhash N., Jadhav Subhash N.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 30-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 11-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 07-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
This document appears to be a civil case order (R.M. No. 53/2019) from Shindkheda Court, Maharashtra, dated 05/03/2020. The case raises four issues: (1) whether the plaintiff proved the defendant owes Rs. 1,00,100/-; (2) whether the defendant actually owes this amount; (3) whether the plaintiff is entitled to interest on Rs. 1,00,100/- and at what rate; and (4) regarding decree and injunction. The document provided shows only the issue formulation and certification pages without the final order/judgment, so the actual outcome (whether the case was allowed, dismissed, or adjourned) cannot be determined from this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document appears to be a civil case order (R.M. No. 53/2019) from Shindkheda Court, Maharashtra, dated 05/03/2020. The case raises four issues: (1) whether the plaintiff proved the defendant owes Rs. 1,00,100/-; (2) whether the defendant actually owes this amount; (3) whether the plaintiff is entitled to interest on Rs. 1,00,100/- and at what rate; and (4) regarding decree and injunction. The document provided shows only the issue formulation and certification pages without the final order/judgment, so the actual outcome (whether the case was allowed, dismissed, or adjourned) cannot be determined from this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts