State of Maharashtra vs Sunil Vikram Sonawane Alias Bhil etc. — 264/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHDH060010182025

Filing Number

569/2025

Filing Date

03-Oct-2025

Registration No

264/2025

Registration Date

03-Oct-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shindkheda

Judge

6-Joint Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C Shindkheda

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

229

Police Station

Shindkheda

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sunil Vikram Sonawane Alias Bhil etc.

  2. 2.Suresh Bhavrao Phule

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court in Shindkheda discharged accused Sunil Vikram Sonawane of offences under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act by invoking Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court found that despite repeated summons, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence and no Charge Attestation report was filed, making it futile to continue proceedings. All bail bonds were cancelled and the case was disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Joint Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C Shindkheda

  4. 27-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Joint Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C Shindkheda

  5. 15-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Joint Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C Shindkheda

  6. 03-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 03-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 264/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court in Shindkheda discharged accused Sunil Vikram Sonawane of offences under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act by invoking Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court found that despite repeated summons, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence and no Charge Attestation report was filed, making it futile to continue proceedings. All bail bonds were cancelled and the case was disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case