State of Maharashtra vs Ravindra Bhatu Koli — 196/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 64(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHDH060006802025

Filing Number

383/2025

Filing Date

10-Jul-2025

Registration No

196/2025

Registration Date

10-Jul-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shindkheda

Judge

6-Joint Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C Shindkheda

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 64(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A.P.P. for State

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ravindra Bhatu Koli

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    Summary: The Judicial Magistrate First Class court in Shindkheda discharged accused Ravindra Bhatu Koli of offences under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and disposed of the case under Section 258 CrPC. The court found that despite repeated summons, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence, making it futile to keep the proceedings pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Joint Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C Shindkheda

  4. 02-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Joint Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C Shindkheda

  5. 10-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Joint Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C Shindkheda

  6. 25-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Joint Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C Shindkheda

  7. 10-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 10-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 196/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Judicial Magistrate First Class court in Shindkheda discharged accused Ravindra Bhatu Koli of offences under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and disposed of the case under Section 258 CrPC. The court found that despite repeated summons, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence, making it futile to keep the proceedings pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case