Sahebrao Manik Patil vs Sahebrao Dhudaku Patil — 24/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHDH060004912024

Evidence

Next Hearing

27th April 2026

e-Filing Number

04-05-2024

Filing Number

148/2024

Filing Date

04-05-2024

Registration No

24/2024

Registration Date

04-05-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shindkheda

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

Sahebrao Manik Patil

Adv. Sonawane Shirishkumar B.

Kevaybai Sahebrao Patil

Adv. Sonawane shirishkumar budha

Respondent(s)

Sahebrao Dhudaku Patil

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda

17-03-2026

Evidence

11-03-2026

Evidence

09-03-2026

Issues

24-02-2026

Issues

20-02-2026

Issues

Interim Orders

17-01-2026
Order on T.I.
17-01-2026
Order on T.I.

Court Order Summary Petition Allowed with Temporary Injunction Granted The Civil Court (First Class Magistrate) at Shindkheda, Dhule District granted a temporary injunction in favor of the petitioner (Sahabrao Manik Patil) on January 17, 2026. The court ordered that the respondents and their representatives are prohibited from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of agricultural land (Plot No. 319) at Varpada village, Shindkheda, Dhule, pending final judgment of the case. The court found that the petitioner has a prima facie case, balance of convenience favors granting the order, and irreparable harm would result if the injunction is not granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Petition Allowed with Temporary Injunction Granted The Civil Court (First Class Magistrate) at Shindkheda, Dhule District granted a temporary injunction in favor of the petitioner (Sahabrao Manik Patil) on January 17, 2026. The court ordered that the respondents and their representatives are prohibited from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of agricultural land (Plot No. 319) at Varpada village, Shindkheda, Dhule, pending final judgment of the case. The court found that the petitioner has a prima facie case, balance of convenience favors granting the order, and irreparable harm would result if the injunction is not granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shindkheda All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case