Sahebrao Manik Patil vs Sahebrao Dhudaku Patil — 24/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHDH060004912024
e-Filing Number
04-05-2024
Filing Number
148/2024
Filing Date
04-May-2024
Registration No
24/2024
Registration Date
04-May-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Shindkheda
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sahebrao Manik Patil
Adv. Sonawane Shirishkumar B.
-
2.Kevaybai Sahebrao Patil
Adv. Sonawane shirishkumar budha
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sahebrao Dhudaku Patil
Case History
-
27-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
09-Mar-2026
Issues
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
24-Feb-2026
Issues
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
20-Feb-2026
Issues
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
17-Jan-2026
Order on T.I.View PDF
-
17-Jan-2026
Order on T.I.View PDF
Court Order Summary Petition Allowed with Temporary Injunction Granted The Civil Court (First Class Magistrate) at Shindkheda, Dhule District granted a temporary injunction in favor of the petitioner (Sahabrao Manik Patil) on January 17, 2026. The court ordered that the respondents and their representatives are prohibited from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of agricultural land (Plot No. 319) at Varpada village, Shindkheda, Dhule, pending final judgment of the case. The court found that the petitioner has a prima facie case, balance of convenience favors granting the order, and irreparable harm would result if the injunction is not granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jan-2026
Issues
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
12-Dec-2025
Order on Exh
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
03-Dec-2025
Order on Exh
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
29-Nov-2025
Order on Exh
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
18-Nov-2025
Order on Exh
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
04-Nov-2025
Order on Exh
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
08-Oct-2025
Order on Exh
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
26-Sep-2025
Order on Exh
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
11-Sep-2025
Order
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
12-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
29-Jul-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
17-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
17-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
10-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
17-Feb-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
30-Jan-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
20-Dec-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
21-Nov-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
17-Oct-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
13-Sep-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
20-Aug-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
12-Jul-2024
Issues
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
18-Jun-2024
Issues
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
10-May-2024
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
-
04-May-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-May-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 24/2024
Court Order Summary Petition Allowed with Temporary Injunction Granted The Civil Court (First Class Magistrate) at Shindkheda, Dhule District granted a temporary injunction in favor of the petitioner (Sahabrao Manik Patil) on January 17, 2026. The court ordered that the respondents and their representatives are prohibited from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of agricultural land (Plot No. 319) at Varpada village, Shindkheda, Dhule, pending final judgment of the case. The court found that the petitioner has a prima facie case, balance of convenience favors granting the order, and irreparable harm would result if the injunction is not granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts