Ramesh Khanderao Shinde vs Bhalerao Adhar Patil Adhyaksh — 64/2024

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 406,420,34,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 08th April 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHDH060004102024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

08-04-2024

Filing Number

284/2024

Filing Date

10-04-2024

Registration No

64/2024

Registration Date

10-04-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shindkheda

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda

Decision Date

08th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Section 406,420,34,

Petitioner(s)

Ramesh Khanderao Shinde

Adv. Ahire Prashant B.

Respondent(s)

Bhalerao Adhar Patil Adhyaksh

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda

08-04-2026

Disposed

06-04-2026

Order on Exh

09-03-2026

Order on Exh

09-02-2026

Order on Exh

16-01-2026

Order on Exh

Final Orders / Judgements

08-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Shindkheda dismissed the private criminal complaint filed by Ramesh Khanderao Shinde under Section 203 of the Criminal Procedure Code, holding that the complainant lacked *locus standi* to prosecute the case. The court reasoned that since the complaint was filed on behalf of the complainant's living father (the directly aggrieved person) without a valid Power of Attorney or proper authorization, and without explanation for the father's inability to approach the court himself, the complainant had no legal standing to initiate proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Shindkheda dismissed the private criminal complaint filed by Ramesh Khanderao Shinde under Section 203 of the Criminal Procedure Code, holding that the complainant lacked *locus standi* to prosecute the case. The court reasoned that since the complaint was filed on behalf of the complainant's living father (the directly aggrieved person) without a valid Power of Attorney or proper authorization, and without explanation for the father's inability to approach the court himself, the complainant had no legal standing to initiate proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shindkheda All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case