Ramesh Khanderao Shinde vs Bhalerao Adhar Patil Adhyaksh — 64/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 406,420,34,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 08th April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHDH060004102024
e-Filing Number
08-04-2024
Filing Number
284/2024
Filing Date
10-04-2024
Registration No
64/2024
Registration Date
10-04-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Shindkheda
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramesh Khanderao Shinde
Adv. Ahire Prashant B.
Respondent(s)
Bhalerao Adhar Patil Adhyaksh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-04-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 09-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 09-02-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 16-01-2026 | Order on Exh |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Shindkheda dismissed the private criminal complaint filed by Ramesh Khanderao Shinde under Section 203 of the Criminal Procedure Code, holding that the complainant lacked *locus standi* to prosecute the case. The court reasoned that since the complaint was filed on behalf of the complainant's living father (the directly aggrieved person) without a valid Power of Attorney or proper authorization, and without explanation for the father's inability to approach the court himself, the complainant had no legal standing to initiate proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Shindkheda dismissed the private criminal complaint filed by Ramesh Khanderao Shinde under Section 203 of the Criminal Procedure Code, holding that the complainant lacked *locus standi* to prosecute the case. The court reasoned that since the complaint was filed on behalf of the complainant's living father (the directly aggrieved person) without a valid Power of Attorney or proper authorization, and without explanation for the father's inability to approach the court himself, the complainant had no legal standing to initiate proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts