Anil Damu Pawar vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - A.P.P. for State — 19/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHDH060002172026

e-Filing Number

18-02-2026

Filing Number

134/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

19/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shindkheda

Judge

6-Joint Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C Shindkheda

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

20

Police Station

Naradhana

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anil Damu Pawar

    Adv. Shaibaz A Shaikh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Advocate - A.P.P. for State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Maharashtra court allowed Anil Damu Pawar's application for interim custody of his seized Mahindra vehicle, finding him to be the registered owner with no competing claims. The court imposed strict conditions including a ₹10 lakh bond, requiring the applicant to produce the vehicle on demand, prevent alterations, avoid alienation, and ensure it is not used in committing offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Joint Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C Shindkheda

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C Shindkheda

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C Shindkheda

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 19/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Maharashtra court allowed Anil Damu Pawar's application for interim custody of his seized Mahindra vehicle, finding him to be the registered owner with no competing claims. The court imposed strict conditions including a ₹10 lakh bond, requiring the applicant to produce the vehicle on demand, prevent alterations, avoid alienation, and ensure it is not used in committing offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case