Kishor Totaram Thorat vs Sunandabai Bhatu Nhyalse etc 4 Advocate - अग्रवाल आर. एन. — 7/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section cpc. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHDH060001722019
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
63/2019
Filing Date
05-02-2019
Registration No
7/2019
Registration Date
05-02-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Shindkheda
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kishor Totaram Thorat
Adv. Marathe B. Z.
Respondent(s)
Sunandabai Bhatu Nhyalse etc 4 Advocate - अग्रवाल आर. एन.
Arunabai Dilip Magar
Adv. पंसारिया शैलेश म.
Latabai Totaram Thorat
Adv. पंसारिया शैलेश म.
Darshana Darmendra Naik
Adv. पंसारिया शैलेश म.
Himmatrao Totaram Thorat
Adv. पंसारिया शैलेश म.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready | |
| 13-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready | |
| 09-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready | |
| 13-02-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready | |
| 27-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The plaintiff's application to amend the plaint under CPC Order VI Rule 17 to correct a typing mistake (replacing "Defendant No. 2" with "Defendant No. 1" in paragraphs 4, 5, 6, and 11) was allowed. The court found the amendment was a mere typographical error that would not change the nature of the suit. The plaintiff was directed to pay costs of Rs. 300 to the defendants and complete the amendment within 14 days, with amended plaint copies to be filed on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The plaintiff's application to amend the plaint under CPC Order VI Rule 17 to correct a typing mistake (replacing "Defendant No. 2" with "Defendant No. 1" in paragraphs 4, 5, 6, and 11) was allowed. The court found the amendment was a mere typographical error that would not change the nature of the suit. The plaintiff was directed to pay costs of Rs. 300 to the defendants and complete the amendment within 14 days, with amended plaint copies to be filed on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts